[#3292] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

55 messages 2004/08/21
[#3350] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/06

Hi, Johan,

[#3351] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/06

Hello.

[#3352] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/06

Hi,

[#3353] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — nobu.nokada@... 2004/09/06

Hi,

[#3354] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/06

Hi,

[#3356] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — nobu.nokada@... 2004/09/07

Hi,

[#3369] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/09

Sorry for late posting. Typhoon striked me.....

[#3372] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — nobu.nokada@... 2004/09/10

Hi,

[#3374] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/10

[#3376] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — nobu.nokada@... 2004/09/10

Hi,

[#3378] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/11

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3383] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — nobu.nokada@... 2004/09/12

Hi,

[#3384] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/13

[#3385] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/13

Hi,

[#3386] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/13

[#3387] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/13

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:

[#3392] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/14

[#3393] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/14

Hi,

[#3394] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/14

[#3395] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/14

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:

[#3399] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/09/15

[#3403] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/15

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:

[#3404] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/15

Hi,

[#3405] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/15

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#3409] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/16

Hi,

[#3416] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/16

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#3303] URGENT: what's the bug reporting system now? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Hello!

14 messages 2004/08/25

Re: Pretty Printing more widely

From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2004-08-26 14:43:54 UTC
List: ruby-core #3318
On Thursday, August 26, 2004, 9:44:29 PM, Hugh wrote:

> My patch would allow

>      pp greetings
>      fp.pp greetings

> to reflect the orthogonality of the other methods.
> Whilst it was trivial for me to fix I had to delve into pp.rb to
> find out that this was possible. 
> IO doesn't have the p method, but since pp is more readable, I
> consider it more useful, and thus a stronger candidate for inclusion
> in IO than p would be.

I agree in spirit, but let me offer an alternative.  #pp is
conceptually similar to #p.  #p doesn't exist in IO-like classes
because it's simply a shortcut for 'puts X.inspect'.  To keep the
analogy between #p and #pp, why can't #pp be a shortcut for "puts
X.something"?

In 'extensions', I define Object#pp_s.  It's not a great name, but
it's a very handy thing to be able to access.  IMO it should be
standard (with a different name).

Cheers,
Gavin


In This Thread