[#3419] Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

Hello list,

19 messages 2004/09/17
[#3422] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3423] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:01, ts wrote:

[#3424] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3425] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:37, ts wrote:

[#3426] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3428] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:05, ts wrote:

[#3429] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling

From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2004-09-14 10:54:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #3395
>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:

H> No, I meant compiler optimization "inline expansion". So, please imagine
H> that code was expanded by compiler automatically.

 Sincerely, I really don't understand : [ruby-dev:19854] is a case of
 "inline expansion"

H> And [ruby-talk:68531] or [ruby-talk:110826]. (nobu said this can be
H> gcc's bug though) 

 The problem with such examples is that only *one* person can reproduce
 it. Difficult to say something about it.

 Like matz said, perhaps some where there is a VALUE which must be
 protected (see the last example with Bignum#&, Bignum#|)


Guy Decoux



In This Thread