[#3419] Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

Hello list,

19 messages 2004/09/17
[#3422] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3423] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:01, ts wrote:

[#3424] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3425] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:37, ts wrote:

[#3426] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3428] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:05, ts wrote:

[#3429] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0

From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2004-09-17 12:05:03 UTC
List: ruby-core #3426
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

A> Ok, but care to explain why? (that is, why valgrinds output should be 
A> discounted?)

 Make a

 watch lomem

svg% gdb ruby
(gdb) watch lomem
Hardware watchpoint 1: lomem
(gdb) r -e 1
Starting program: /home/ts/ruby/ruby-1.8.2/ruby -e 1
Hardware watchpoint 1: lomem
Hardware watchpoint 1: lomem
Hardware watchpoint 1: lomem
Hardware watchpoint 1: lomem
Hardware watchpoint 1: lomem
Hardware watchpoint 1: lomem

Old value = (struct RVALUE *) 0x0
New value = (struct RVALUE *) 0x4007a008
add_heap () at gc.c:358
358         if (himem < pend) himem = pend;
(gdb) 




Guy Decoux

In This Thread