[#3419] Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

Hello list,

19 messages 2004/09/17
[#3422] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3423] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:01, ts wrote:

[#3424] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3425] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:37, ts wrote:

[#3426] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3428] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:05, ts wrote:

[#3429] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

Re: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare)

From: Patrick May <patrick@...>
Date: 2004-09-09 23:55:55 UTC
List: ruby-core #3370
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, at 03:54  AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
> A Ruby19 works:
>
> $ ruby19 -v x.rb
> ruby 1.9.0 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd5.2]
> running
> at_exit
> running
> $
>
> On FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE it works:
>
> $ ruby -v x.rb
> ruby 1.8.1 (2003-12-25) [i386-freebsd4]
> running
> at_exit
> running
> $
>
> (Same for a 2004-07-29 build)
>
> (at_exit only fires once for both of these)

 From what I know of ruby, I think at_exit firing once is a 'bug', even 
if it doesn't core dump.  I hit this bug while trying matz's fastcgi 
trick [ruby-talk:13428].  In that example, continuations are used to 
invisibly create a loop in plain cgi script.  This allows the script to 
become a persistent fastcgi process.

I am not a c programmer, so I can't help.  Thank you for taking the 
time to look at this bug.  I appreciate your help.

Cheers,

Patrick


In This Thread