[#3419] Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

Hello list,

19 messages 2004/09/17
[#3422] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3423] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:01, ts wrote:

[#3424] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3425] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:37, ts wrote:

[#3426] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

[#3428] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:05, ts wrote:

[#3429] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:

Re: Ruby and FHS

From: Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Date: 2004-09-15 11:00:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #3406
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:11:27 +0900, Kirill A. Shutemov
<k.shutemov@sam-solutions.net> wrote:
> Ruby has some nonconformity with  Filesystem Hierarchy Standard:
> 
> * headers placed in /usr/lib/ruby... but must be placed in
> /usr/include/ruby (see 4.7 and 4.6 of FHS)
> 
> * .rb of standart library  placed in /usr/lib/ruby/... but must be
> placed in /usr/share/ruby... becouse it's system independent part of ruby
> (see 4.7 and 4.11 of FSH)

Is the FHS a Linux thing, or does it cross Unix boundaries? If the
former, then I don't really see a reason to follow it. Sorry.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca
: as of this email, I have [ 6 ] Gmail invitations

In This Thread

Prev Next