[#3358] Fwd: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Patrick May <patrick@...>
Hello,
8 messages
2004/09/09
[#3359] Re: Fwd: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2004/09/09
Patrick May (patrick@hexane.org) wrote:
[#3419] Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
Hello list,
19 messages
2004/09/17
[#3422] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/17
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3423] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
2004/09/17
On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:01, ts wrote:
[#3424] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/17
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3425] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
2004/09/17
On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:37, ts wrote:
[#3426] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/17
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3428] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
2004/09/17
On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:05, ts wrote:
[#3429] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/17
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3430] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
2004/09/17
On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:30, ts wrote:
[#3431] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/17
>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3432] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
2004/09/17
On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:50, ts wrote:
[#3433] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
2004/09/17
There is a minor flaw in my analysis toward the end; ignore previous email
[#3434] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
2004/09/17
On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:50, ts wrote:
[#3437] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/17
Hi,
[PATCH] delegate.rb has debugging p
From:
Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date:
2004-09-19 18:55:38 UTC
List:
ruby-core #3457
While using DL with a Tempfile, I found it printing [:to_ptr] during my tests. I looked all over DL to find where this mystery printout came from, but eventually caught it in delegate.rb when I noticed that it only printed out when I was used Tempfile. Attached is the patch. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net All messages signed with fingerprint: FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04
Attachments (2)
delegate.diff
(841 Bytes, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/delegate.rb
===================================================================
RCS file: /src/ruby/lib/delegate.rb,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -9 -p -r1.18 delegate.rb
--- lib/delegate.rb 7 May 2004 08:44:22 -0000 1.18
+++ lib/delegate.rb 19 Sep 2004 18:50:58 -0000
@@ -86,19 +86,18 @@ def DelegateClass(superclass)
klass = Class.new
methods = superclass.public_instance_methods(true)
methods -= ::Kernel.public_instance_methods(false)
methods |= ["to_s","to_a","inspect","==","=~","==="]
klass.module_eval {
def initialize(obj)
@_dc_obj = obj
end
def method_missing(m, *args)
- p [m, *args]
unless @_dc_obj.respond_to?(m)
super(m, *args)
end
@_dc_obj.__send__(m, *args)
end
def __getobj__
@_dc_obj
end
def __setobj__(obj)
PGP.sig
(186 Bytes, application/pgp-signature)