[#3266] 1.8.2 preview bug? — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
I haven't had time to really investigate this, but I've boiled it down
6 messages
2004/08/10
[#3269] YAML problem, possibly? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I obtained a largish lump of shallow XML, succcessfully read it with
6 messages
2004/08/10
[#3292] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
55 messages
2004/08/21
[#3350] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/06
Hi, Johan,
[#3351] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/06
Hello.
[#3352] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/06
Hi,
[#3353] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/09/06
Hi,
[#3354] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/06
Hi,
[#3356] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/09/07
Hi,
[#3369] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/09
Sorry for late posting. Typhoon striked me.....
[#3372] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/09/10
Hi,
[#3374] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/10
[#3376] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/09/10
Hi,
[#3378] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/11
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3383] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/09/12
Hi,
[#3384] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/13
[#3385] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/13
Hi,
[#3386] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/13
[#3387] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/13
>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#3392] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/14
[#3393] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/14
Hi,
[#3394] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/14
[#3395] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/14
>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#3399] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/15
[#3403] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/15
>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#3404] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/15
Hi,
[#3405] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/15
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#3409] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/16
Hi,
[#3416] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/16
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#3435] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/17
Hi,
[#3436] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/09/17
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#3438] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/17
Hi,
[#3441] European Rubykonf 2004
— Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
2004/09/17
[#3402] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/09/15
Hi,
[#3410] Re: [PATCH] dir.c --- Dir.chdir error handling
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2004/09/16
[#3293] 1.8.1 gsub/CGI behavior I can't explain — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
8 messages
2004/08/22
[#3301] Is Ruby 1.8.2 100% Backward compatible — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
6 messages
2004/08/25
[#3345] Re: Is Ruby 1.8.2 100% Backward compatible
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/09/03
[#3303] URGENT: what's the bug reporting system now? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Hello!
14 messages
2004/08/25
[#3304] Re: URGENT: what's the bug reporting system now?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2004/08/25
Hi,
[#3306] Re: URGENT: what's the bug reporting system now?
— Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
2004/08/26
[#3315] Pretty Printing more widely — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
May I propose the following patch (done against the 1.9.0 nightly
8 messages
2004/08/26
[#3331] "destructiveness" of delete — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
6 messages
2004/08/31
Re: YAML problem, possibly?
From:
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date:
2004-08-10 13:51:41 UTC
List:
ruby-core #3272
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Sean E. Russell wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 August 2004 06:35, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
>> I used D last night on one machine, but it blows up on this one in
>> REXML, for reasons I don't know, but I get the same YAML problem as
>> before with I.aiml. In case anyone was wondering about my typing
>> skills [or worse] :-).
>
> What is the REXML error message?
I remembered over lunch that I did fixup some bugs in the XML in
some files on the other machine, and D was probably one.
E:\Downloads\AnnaAIML-.7.0\anna_brain>xml_to_yaml.rb
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/rexml/parsers/treeparser.rb:85:in `parse': REXML::ParseExce
ption from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/rexml/document.rb:176:in `build'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/rexml/document.rb:45:in `initialize'
from E:/Downloads/AnnaAIML-.7.0/anna_brain/xml_to_yaml.rb:6:in `new'
from E:/Downloads/AnnaAIML-.7.0/anna_brain/xml_to_yaml.rb:6
from E:/Downloads/AnnaAIML-.7.0/anna_brain/xml_to_yaml.rb:5:in `open'
from E:/Downloads/AnnaAIML-.7.0/anna_brain/xml_to_yaml.rb:5
E:\Downloads\AnnaAIML-.7.0\anna_brain>
The problem with this message is not that it is a ParseError, it is that
it doesn't tell you where in the stream (line, token, ?) it has died.
I should be the first to admit, however, that my ability to write parsers,
and ones that give useful diags, leaves A LOT to be desired; so this
really is intended to be constructive criticism! When REXML works it
is a pleasure to use.
Thank you,
Hugh
>