ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#3337] CVS Head Build Failing on Cygwin — Robert McGovern <robert.mcgovern@...>

Freshly checked head out today, building fails on Cygwin when

1 message 2004/09/01

[#3341] Resource limitations — David Ross <drossruby@...>

Just curious, but why can't there be limitations be

4 messages 2004/09/03
[#3342] Re: Resource limitations — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/03

Hi,
[#3343] Re: Resource limitations — David Ross <drossruby@...> 2004/09/03

[#3344] Re: Resource limitations — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/03

Hi,

[#3355] ANN: One-Click Ruby Installer for OS X — Stephen Steiner <ssteiner@...>

I have begun work on a version of the One-Click Ruby Installer for Mac

1 message 2004/09/07

[#3358] Fwd: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Patrick May <patrick@...>

Hello,

8 messages 2004/09/09
[#3359] Re: Fwd: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/09/09

Patrick May (patrick@hexane.org) wrote:
[#3370] Re: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/09/09

[#3371] Re: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/10

Hi,
[#3470] Re: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/09/29

Hello,
[#3373] Re: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/09/10

On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 08:55:55AM +0900, Patrick May wrote:
[#3471] Re: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/09/29

[#3360] Re: Fwd: fastcgi & continuations (Re: Idea: Webshare) — Kaspar Schiess <eule@...> 2004/09/09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#3361] Segmentation fault in todays 1.9 cvs checkout — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all

2 messages 2004/09/09
[#3364] Re: Segmentation fault in todays 1.9 cvs checkout — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/09

>>>>> "T" == Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@bluewin.ch> writes:

[#3362] Segmentation fault in todays 1.9 cvs checkout — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all

1 message 2004/09/09

[#3363] proposal: new switch for test/runner.rb — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/09/09

[#3366] Threads, serial ports and Linux don't mix — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

I raised an issue on ruby-talk which relates to the core engine, but nobody

2 messages 2004/09/09
[#3368] Re: Threads, serial ports and Linux don't mix — David Ross <drossruby@...> 2004/09/09

Most likely a bug, you should email matz. He would

[#3367] Suggestion: OpenSSL::PKey::RSA.new_from_parameters — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

I would like to propose that a new constructor method be added to the Ruby

1 message 2004/09/09

[#3377] Ruby-Stable Snapshot build — David Ross <drossruby@...>

Okay, I am having a problem with ruby-stable snapshot.

1 message 2004/09/11

[#3379] RDoc Formatter Simple Mode — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

For rbot's ri module I needed a more compact ri format than plain to

2 messages 2004/09/11
[#3398] Re: RDoc Formatter Simple Mode — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/09/15

[#3381] Let mkmf's have_library specify headers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I was trying to build GDChart, but its extconf.rb was unable to find

1 message 2004/09/12

[#3391] Do I need to do something extra to get ripper to compile — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

In the CVS HEAD, if I do autoconf/configure/make, I get

2 messages 2004/09/13
[#3397] Re: Do I need to do something extra to get ripper to compile — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/09/14

Hi,

[#3396] — "EveryLittleThing" <elel1223@...>

1 message 2004/09/14

[#3401] Ruby and FHS — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>

Ruby has some nonconformity with Filesystem Hierarchy Standard:

1 message 2004/09/15

[#3406] Re: Ruby and FHS — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:11:27 +0900, Kirill A. Shutemov

2 messages 2004/09/15
[#3407] Re: Ruby and FHS — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2004/09/15

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 08:00:30PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#3408] Re: Ruby and FHS — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...>

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 08:12:33PM +0900, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

2 messages 2004/09/15
[#3413] Re: Ruby and FHS — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...> 2004/09/16

* Eivind Eklund <eivind@> [040916 09:17]:

[#3419] Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

Hello list,

19 messages 2004/09/17
[#3421] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Robert McGovern <robert.mcgovern@...> 2004/09/17

> The global static variables lomem and himem in gc.c do not seem to be
[#3422] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3423] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:01, ts wrote:
[#3424] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3425] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 12:37, ts wrote:
[#3426] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3428] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:05, ts wrote:
[#3429] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3430] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:30, ts wrote:
[#3431] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/17

>>>>> "A" == Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
[#3432] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:50, ts wrote:
[#3433] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

There is a minor flaw in my analysis toward the end; ignore previous email
[#3434] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 13:50, ts wrote:
[#3437] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/17

Hi,
[#3440] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/17

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 16:05, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#3442] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Ruben <Ruben.Vandeginste@...> 2004/09/17

At Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:31:36 +0900,
[#3451] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/09/18

On Friday 17 Sep 2004 19:48, Ruben wrote:
[#3447] Re: Valgrind analysis of [BUG] unknown node type 0 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/18

Hi,

[#3420] make install -- ruby 1.8.2 (2004-09-17) — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2004/09/17
[#3427] Re: make install -- ruby 1.8.2 (2004-09-17) — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/09/17

Hi,

[#3446] dir.c (II) — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

4 messages 2004/09/17
[#3450] Re: [PATCH] dir.c (II) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/18

Hi,
[#3454] Re: [PATCH] dir.c (II) — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/09/19

[#3455] Re: [PATCH] dir.c (II) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/19

Hi,

[#3456] Memory-leak --- block/exception related — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

3 messages 2004/09/19
[#3459] Re: Memory-leak --- block/exception related — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/09/20

[#3460] Re: Memory-leak --- block/exception related — ts <decoux@...> 2004/09/20

>>>>> "J" == Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se> writes:

[#3457] delegate.rb has debugging p — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

While using DL with a Tempfile, I found it printing [:to_ptr] during my

2 messages 2004/09/19
[#3458] Re: [PATCH] delegate.rb has debugging p — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/09/19

On Monday, September 20, 2004, 4:55:38 AM, Eric wrote:

[#3462] rb_ary_equal ("1.8.2 2004-09-17") — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2004/09/21
[#3463] Re: rb_ary_equal ("1.8.2 2004-09-17") — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/09/21

Hi,

[#3464] REXML's Shift_JIS handling is not good — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2004/09/26
[#3465] Re: REXML's Shift_JIS handling is not good — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/09/26

On Sunday 26 September 2004 06:04, Kouhei Sutou wrote:

[#3466] ML services will be stop for maintenance — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/09/27
[#3467] Re: ML services will be stop for maintenance — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/09/27

Hi,
[#3469] Re: ML services will be stop for maintenance — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/09/28

Hi,

[#3468] segfaulting in IO.popen() — Andres Salomon <dilinger@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/09/27

Re: "destructiveness" of delete

From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2004-09-01 11:20:31 UTC
List: ruby-core #3338 
Hi --

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In message ""destructiveness" of delete"
>     on 04/08/31, "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:
> 
> |I know there's no Array#delete! because "delete" already
> |implies in-place change.  But I recently noticed that
> |there is a String#delete! as well as String#delete.  Just
> |wondering why, or whether these behaviors will be unified.
> 
> Just because they are different, probably they had different origins
> that unfortunately slept away from my brain.  I didn't feel strings
> and arrays were similar no more than they both had [] and each,
> and I still don't.

I don't either, but I think the question of how "delete" relates to
"delete!" is separate.  I would favor unification, not because strings
should be similar to arrays but to avoid having two conflicting
rationales (even if one of them has been forgotten :-) for how
"delete[!]" relates to its receiver.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net

In This Thread

Prev Next