[#28015] RCR: RUBY_VERSION_INT — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Situation:

14 messages 2010/02/02

[#28113] [Bug #2723] $: length affects re-require time of already loaded files — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2723: $: length affects re-require time of already loaded files

16 messages 2010/02/08

[#28151] [Bug #2739] ruby 1.8.7 built with pthreads hangs under some circumstances — Joel Ebel <redmine@...>

Bug #2739: ruby 1.8.7 built with pthreads hangs under some circumstances

31 messages 2010/02/11

[#28188] [Bug #2750] build fails on win32/MinGW: "executable host ruby is required." even when --with-baseruby is used — Christian Bodt <redmine@...>

Bug #2750: build fails on win32/MinGW: "executable host ruby is required." even when --with-baseruby is used

9 messages 2010/02/16

[#28206] Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi matz --

23 messages 2010/02/18
[#28212] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28219] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28225] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28233] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28265] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/20

Hi,

[#28286] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2010/02/21

Hi

[#28291] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/22

Hi!

[#28235] [Feature #2759] Regexp /g and /G options — Michael Fellinger <redmine@...>

Feature #2759: Regexp /g and /G options

35 messages 2010/02/18

[#28329] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2dev has passed RubySpec! — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2010/02/24

[#28355] [ANN] Toward rich diversity of Ruby development. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

A short announcement: thanks to some helps of GitHub people, I now have

12 messages 2010/02/27

[#28365] Indentifying key MRI-on-Windows issues — Jon <jon.forums@...>

In an effort to begin summarizing key MRI-on-Windows open issues I'm starting this thread in hopes that those interested will respond with details on the key MRI issues they feel need resolution for Windows users.

11 messages 2010/02/27
[#28690] Re: Indentifying key MRI-on-Windows issues — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/03/16

> My key concern is http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-=

[ruby-core:28246] [Backport #2762] in `sub!': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8 (ArgumentError); using backticks

From: Johannes Dewender <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-02-18 22:13:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #28246
Backport #2762: in `sub!': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8 (ArgumentError); using backticks
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2762

Author: Johannes Dewender
Status: Open, Priority: Normal

Current stalbe ruby 1.9.1 has problems with UTF/Unicode strings coming from backticks.
Reading the file with File.read('filename') works as expected. Only using backticks gives an error in a substitution afterwards:
in `sub!': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8 (ArgumentError)

This is my test skript:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
puts "Using ruby #{RUBY_VERSION} on #{RUBY_PLATFORM} from #{RUBY_RELEASE_DATE}"
puts "File.read:"
File.read('testString.txt').sub!(/foo.*/, "hallo")
puts "  success"
puts "backticks:"
`cat testString.txt`.sub!(/foo.*/, "hallo")
puts "  success"
puts "No problem in this version"


And this is the output on the ruby versions I tested:

Using ruby 1.8.7 on x86_64-linux from 2010-01-10
File.read:
  success
backticks:
  success
No problem in this version

Using ruby 1.9.1 on x86_64-linux from 2010-01-10
File.read:
  success
backticks:
./test.rb:9:in `sub!': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8 (ArgumentError)
        from ./test.rb:9:in `<main>

Using ruby 1.9.2 on x86_64-linux from 2010-02-13
File.read:
  success
backticks:
  success
No problem in this version

(using revision 26652 for 1.9.2)


So it is working in 1.9.2 again, but could this fix get backported to stable 1.9.1? I could not find out which revision this is fixed though, because I had trouble compiling older revisions.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next