[#28015] RCR: RUBY_VERSION_INT — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Situation:

14 messages 2010/02/02

[#28113] [Bug #2723] $: length affects re-require time of already loaded files — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2723: $: length affects re-require time of already loaded files

16 messages 2010/02/08

[#28151] [Bug #2739] ruby 1.8.7 built with pthreads hangs under some circumstances — Joel Ebel <redmine@...>

Bug #2739: ruby 1.8.7 built with pthreads hangs under some circumstances

31 messages 2010/02/11

[#28188] [Bug #2750] build fails on win32/MinGW: "executable host ruby is required." even when --with-baseruby is used — Christian Bodt <redmine@...>

Bug #2750: build fails on win32/MinGW: "executable host ruby is required." even when --with-baseruby is used

9 messages 2010/02/16

[#28206] Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi matz --

23 messages 2010/02/18
[#28212] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28219] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28225] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28233] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28265] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/20

Hi,

[#28286] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2010/02/21

Hi

[#28291] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/22

Hi!

[#28235] [Feature #2759] Regexp /g and /G options — Michael Fellinger <redmine@...>

Feature #2759: Regexp /g and /G options

35 messages 2010/02/18

[#28329] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2dev has passed RubySpec! — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2010/02/24

[#28355] [ANN] Toward rich diversity of Ruby development. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

A short announcement: thanks to some helps of GitHub people, I now have

12 messages 2010/02/27

[#28365] Indentifying key MRI-on-Windows issues — Jon <jon.forums@...>

In an effort to begin summarizing key MRI-on-Windows open issues I'm starting this thread in hopes that those interested will respond with details on the key MRI issues they feel need resolution for Windows users.

11 messages 2010/02/27
[#28690] Re: Indentifying key MRI-on-Windows issues — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/03/16

> My key concern is http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-=

[ruby-core:28216] Re: Removing Syck from ruby

From: "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Date: 2010-02-18 10:48:20 UTC
List: ruby-core #28216
Hi,

(2010/02/18 16:22), Aaron Patterson wrote:
> I would like to move my replacement (Psych[1]) in to ruby's svn so that
> people can start migrating to the new API.

You can import Psych to ruby's svn whe you think it is near to complete
because Psych will use other than ext/syck. (ext/psych?)
So both of ext/syck and ext/psych can be.

After Matz agree the name of the lib (ext/psych) and the class (Psych? YAML?),
you can import it.

> Psych has a *mostly* compatible API with Syck.  Since Psych uses
> libyaml, that means it follows the YAML spec more closely than Syck
> does.  This means that switching from Syck to Psych /will/ break things.
> 
> To ensure a smooth transition, I am working with the rails team[2], and
> with Eric (for rubygems support).
> 
> Is this a good plan?

Following YAML spec breaks Syck compatibility,
so working with Rails, the heavy and maniac user of YAML, is good.

> I would like to remove Syck from ruby, and release it as a gem that I
> will maintain.  That way people depending on the legacy behaviors of
> Syck will not be let down, though they will be highly encouraged to
> upgrade.

This is also good thing.

-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse@airemix.jp>

In This Thread