[#28015] RCR: RUBY_VERSION_INT — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Situation:

14 messages 2010/02/02

[#28113] [Bug #2723] $: length affects re-require time of already loaded files — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2723: $: length affects re-require time of already loaded files

16 messages 2010/02/08

[#28151] [Bug #2739] ruby 1.8.7 built with pthreads hangs under some circumstances — Joel Ebel <redmine@...>

Bug #2739: ruby 1.8.7 built with pthreads hangs under some circumstances

31 messages 2010/02/11

[#28188] [Bug #2750] build fails on win32/MinGW: "executable host ruby is required." even when --with-baseruby is used — Christian Bodt <redmine@...>

Bug #2750: build fails on win32/MinGW: "executable host ruby is required." even when --with-baseruby is used

9 messages 2010/02/16

[#28206] Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi matz --

23 messages 2010/02/18
[#28212] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28219] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28225] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28233] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2010/02/18

Hi,

[#28265] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/20

Hi,

[#28286] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2010/02/21

Hi

[#28291] Re: Is Math module a wrapper of libm? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/02/22

Hi!

[#28235] [Feature #2759] Regexp /g and /G options — Michael Fellinger <redmine@...>

Feature #2759: Regexp /g and /G options

35 messages 2010/02/18
[#28459] [Feature #2759] Regexp /g and /G options — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/03/04

Issue #2759 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#28329] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2dev has passed RubySpec! — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2010/02/24

[#28355] [ANN] Toward rich diversity of Ruby development. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

A short announcement: thanks to some helps of GitHub people, I now have

12 messages 2010/02/27

[#28365] Indentifying key MRI-on-Windows issues — Jon <jon.forums@...>

In an effort to begin summarizing key MRI-on-Windows open issues I'm starting this thread in hopes that those interested will respond with details on the key MRI issues they feel need resolution for Windows users.

11 messages 2010/02/27
[#28690] Re: Indentifying key MRI-on-Windows issues — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/03/16

> My key concern is http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/24968

[ruby-core:28108] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp

From: "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Date: 2010-02-08 12:56:43 UTC
List: ruby-core #28108
Current Ruby 1.9 can run the script,

(2010/02/08 18:15), Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:28104] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp"
>     on Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:36:07 +0900, Greg Hazel <redmine@ruby-lang.org> writes:
> 
> |Well, considering other regexp implementations do not have this bug,
> my guess would be this is either easy or a matter of switching to a better regexp parser,
> which probably has other benefits.
> 
> I don't know any other regex implementation that allows the current
> feature set with M17N available.  Do you?
> 
> We just cannot abandon the current implementation to fix this
> relatively minor issue.  Besides that, I'm afraid most DFA regex
> matcher would have this issue anyway.

Current trend, Irregexp doesn't be suited for M17N.

TRE seems M17N and can be compiled with VC++.
http://laurikari.net/tre/
But its internal presentation is wide character,
so conversion is needed on matching.

-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse@airemix.jp>

In This Thread