[#15348] Expanding arrays in method calls - why the restriction? — mathew <meta@...>
I can do
[#15359] Timeout::Error — Jeremy Thurgood <jerith@...>
Good day,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 06:20 AM, Jeremy Thurgood wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Joel VanderWerf wrote:
Jeremy Thurgood wrote:
Joel VanderWerf wrote:
Jeremy Thurgood wrote:
Hi,
Jeremy Thurgood wrote:
Jim Hranicky wrote:
Jeremy Thurgood wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:37:57 +0900, Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com> wrote:
[#15360] reopen: can't change access mode from "w+" to "w"? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
I ran 'rake test' on test/spec [1], using
Hi,
In article <20080206043831.7F10DE067F@mail.bc9.jp>,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
In article <47AAE922.5020804@intertwingly.net>,
[#15375] weird behavior of belongs_to referencing a model with set_table_name : a bug? — "Yuri Leikind" <yuri.leikind@...>
Hello all,
[#15381] gem versioning patch doesn't seem to have been applied to HEAD — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
A while back, I believe that Rich Kilmer created a patch to gems in
[#15383] Have the rules for source file encoding changed? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Does the -E command line option no longer set source file encoding?
Ni,
[#15389] STDIN encoding differs from default source file encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
This seems strange:
Dave Thomas wrote:
NARUSE, Yui wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#15399] Non-blocking SSL handshake — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>
Hello. I'm attempting to use SSL within my Fiber-based Actor framework (
[#15400] string[0..-1] no longer uses copy on write — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com>
As the subject states, in 1.8 string[0..-1] used copy on write but in
[#15429] rdoc/irb incompatibilities? — "Chad Woolley" <thewoolleyman@...>
Hello,
On Feb 8, 2008, at 03:50 AM, Chad Woolley wrote:
[#15445] IRHG -- Dumping T-Nodes — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
OK - Here is the problem
[#15464] Possibly a timeout related problem — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Setting up a sleep seems to interfere with signal handlers. The
[#15465] Synced IO seems not to be thread-safe — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Take the following code:
[#15475] where's a complete list of assignment shortcuts? += &= %= etc. — Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Ruby Core:
[#15481] very bad character performance on ruby1.9 — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
I'd like to bring up the issue of how characters are represented in
Hi,
On Feb 11, 2008 11:51 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#15496] Build failures - Revision 15428 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
This change caused many build failures for me.
[#15528] Test::Unit maintainer — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>
Hi Nathaniel, Ryan,
<snip>
Hi Ryan,
Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#15534] An Masgn of 1 — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>
There's a weird case in Ruby that produces an masgn of a single argument,
[#15539] IRHG - Slow Child Working? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
For the life of me ,
[#15551] Proc#curry — ts <decoux@...>
ts wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15585] Ruby M17N meeting summary — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
This is a rough translation of the Japanese meeting summary
On Feb 18, 2008, at 4:33 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
Martin Duerst wrote:
On 19/02/2008, Gonzalo Garramu単o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wrote:
[#15589] Different stacktraces in 1.8 and 1.9 — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
[#15596] possible bug in regexp lexing — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
current:
In article <96106826-DFF4-4BFC-9938-3CB54F28F9F1@zenspider.com>,
In article <87wsp177pg.fsf@fsij.org>,
Hi,
In article <20080220125943.78CB3E0297@mail.bc9.jp>,
[#15610] — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#15630] embedding ruby | marking and sweeping wrapped structs — Matthew Metnetsky <met@...>
All,
[#15637] Options for String#encode — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I just commited a very first implementation of using a hash for
[#15656] defining a method with attached data — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
For various reasons, I need to be able to attached some piece of data to
Attached is a patch to add this feature directly into YARV without a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:54:13AM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
[#15667] Gems running aground on multibyte char — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Feb 27, 2008, at 18:27 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#15672] File.flock in ruby 1.9.0 — llin <cheempz@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "l" == llin <cheempz@gmail.com> writes:
[#15675] Ruby does not support mkfifo — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Today I needed to call mkfifo() and found out that Ruby does not support
[#15678] Re: [ANN] MacRuby — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
On 2/27/08, Laurent Sansonetti <laurent.sansonetti@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1? Ruby 1.9.1? OneClickInstaller191? PickAxe 3?
Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote: > Good Afternoon! > > I have some questions concerning (realistic) schedules and details. They > are addressed to different persons. > > 1) Ruby 1.9.0-1 > - Is the February 08 date still valid? > - Is it still a development version, or goes it > into the direction of a production version? > - Will the encoding methods be complete? > > 2) Ruby 1.9.1 > - Is there already a planned delivery date for > Ruby 1.9.1? > - Will Ruby 1.9.1 a production stable version? > > 3) OneClickInstaller191 > - Will there be a OneClickInstaller version for > Ruby 1.9.1 on Windows systems? > - Are there activities to produce a production > stable system for Windows based in MinGW/MSYS? > - Does there some schedule exist? > > 4) PickAxe3 > - Is there a fixed schedule for the printed version > of PickAxe 3? > > This are my questions for planning to use Ruby 1.9.1 > for production, mainly textual processing, major platform > will be Windows. > > Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner > > This may or may not be relevant, but I have successfully built and benchmarked Ruby 1.9.0 under Cygwin. I haven't run the tests or attempted to use it -- I was mostly curious about how an "-O3 -march=pentium4" build of Ruby 1.9 would compare with the stock Cygwin Ruby 1.8.6. I have no idea how the stock Cygwin Ruby was compiled. GCC version is 3.4.4. benchmark results: name ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13) [i386-cygwin] ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-25 revision 14709) [i386-cygwin] app_answer 1.093 0.703 app_erb 3.094 3.844 app_factorial 1.172 1.437 app_fib 11.532 2.343 app_mandelbrot 3.938 1.797 app_pentomino 168.297 78.968 app_raise 3.500 3.547 app_strconcat 3.922 1.625 app_tak 13.547 3.187 app_tarai 10.907 2.843 app_uri 6.719 3.813 io_file_create 21.625 23.765 io_file_read 3.735 4.328 io_file_write 1.312 1.813 loop_generator 71.312 10.813 loop_times 10.406 6.953 loop_whileloop 13.125 1.610 loop_whileloop2 2.671 0.688 so_ackermann 19.734 2.375 so_array 9.860 4.140 so_binary_trees 5.172 3.015 so_concatenate 3.532 2.468 so_count_words 0.922 8.187 so_exception 7.359 5.922 so_fannkuch 134.828 111.454 so_fasta 19.547 18.219 so_k_nucleotide 13.437 8.875 so_lists 2.578 2.484 so_mandelbrot 58.265 32.219 so_matrix 4.265 2.969 so_meteor_contest 88.312 35.532 so_nbody 37.703 16.812 so_nested_loop 11.969 6.938 so_nsieve 33.781 12.625 so_nsieve_bits 97.593 15.297 so_object 20.549 5.574 so_partial_sums 43.930 21.414 so_pidigits 6.898 10.156 so_random 4.360 2.111 so_reverse_complement 22.128 23.854 so_sieve 1.219 1.469 so_spectralnorm 50.999 26.019 vm1_block* 36.152 6.968 vm1_const* 12.490 2.969 vm1_ensure* 14.398 2.515 vm1_ivar* 13.394 6.499 vm1_ivar_set* 11.353 6.812 vm1_length* 17.671 4.437 vm1_neq* 11.299 3.843 vm1_not* 3.210 3.655 vm1_rescue* 7.097 2.140 vm1_simplereturn* 24.992 4.828 vm1_swap* 47.687 4.265 vm2_array* 11.994 8.374 vm2_case* 7.100 1.234 vm2_eval* 41.799 154.235 vm2_method* 27.114 8.109 vm2_mutex* 8.444 14.805