Re: Test::Unit maintainer

Hi,

In <[e-mail]>
  "Re: Test::Unit maintainer" on Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:15:40 +0900,
  Phlip <[e-mail]> wrote:

> its capacity for customizations. To put a light refactor on that, I suspect you 
> should break run(result) into into narrow calls that are easy to override:

I'll do so. And some property set methods will be added. e.g.:

  class MyGenericTestCase < Test::Unit::TestCase
    setup # or other name
    def my_setup
      ... # will be called even if #setup is overrode.
    end
  end

  class MyTestCase < MyGenericTestCase
    def setup
      ...
    end

    def test_XXX
      ... # will be called after #setup and #my_setup are called
    end
  end

> Esthetically, setup is no longer in the same method as teardown. The benefit is 
> one could add a method like skip() by overriding only run_case, without then 
> inflicting their change on all the other statements in there.

I'll add the method as built-in.


Thanks,
--
kou