From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Date: 2008-02-20T00:00:47+09:00
Subject: Re: [Spam] Ruby M17N meeting summary

In article <47BA6B64.6050408@advancedsl.com.ar>,
  Gonzalo Garramu�o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> writes:

> Is this a good idea at all?  Often times, libraries need to be modified 
> due to bugs or enhanced features.  By being able to change LOAD_PATH, 
> this is trivial.  Any use of require_relative in a library module will 
> screw that up completely and prevent files from being overridden.

I think require_relative should be used in a library or
test.

For example, I used require_relative in
test/ruby/test_file.rb and test/ruby/test_pipe.rb
to require test/ruby/ut_eof.rb.

I guess no one want to use modified ut_eof.rb by changing
load path.
-- 
Tanaka Akira