From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2008-02-14T16:12:06+09:00
Subject: Re: NODE_NEWLINE > NODE_LAST

Hi,

In message "Re: NODE_NEWLINE > NODE_LAST"
    on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:33:59 +0900, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

|NODE_LAST is 108 but NODE_NEWLINE is 128, because it is defined outside 
|the enum.  Is this intentional?

Yes, NODE_NEWLINE is a flag, not node type.  Maybe not a good name.

|It seems that it is intentional.  However, it has the potential to break 
|code, because NODE_NEWLINE used to be a node type, but now it's a flag. 
|  Should it be renamed?

Any proposal?

							matz.