From: Trans Date: 2008-02-23T03:27:02+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby M17N meeting summary On Feb 20, 4:37 pm, "Jeremy Kemper" wrote: > On Feb 20, 2008 11:35 AM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 2008, at 2:33 AM, Martin Duerst wrote: > > > > == Looking for a successor for cgi.rb > > > Conditions are as follows: > > > * different name than cgi.rb > > > * using MVC separation > > > May I suggest we use a stripped down version of rack for the cgi.rb > > replacement?http://rack.rubyforge.org/ > > > I am using this as the basis for my merb web framework. I know that > > rails is thinking of switching to use it also. Many of the other newer > > ruby web platforms re using it as well. We plan to use rack as the > > interface to rubyland in mod_rubinius. > > > I think this would make a very suitable replacement for cgi.rb. I > > would be happy to volunteer to spearhead the work on getting this into > > the stdlib. > > > Thoughts? > > Seconded, though I wish Rack would use a more Rubyish API than > big-hash-in/conventional-array-out. I think it's only a good idea if API is much improved. I've use Rack too and it works well, but the API is rather painful. T.