[#101179] Spectre Mitigations — Amel <amel.smajic@...>
Hi there!
5 messages
2020/12/01
[#101180] Re: Spectre Mitigations
— Chris Seaton <chris@...>
2020/12/01
I wouldn’t recommend using Ruby to run in-process untrusted code in the first place. Are people doing that?
[#101694] Ruby 3.0.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
We are pleased to announce the release of Ruby 3.0.0. From 2015 we
4 messages
2020/12/25
[ruby-core:101585] [Ruby master Misc#17399] Are endless methods experimental?
From:
mame@...
Date:
2020-12-21 13:13:03 UTC
List:
ruby-core #101585
Issue #17399 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Note that there is no consensus that a warning should be printed when any experimental features are used. As far as I understand, the reasony why pattern matching prints a warning is just because the author, @ktsj, is an attentive person. Personally, I'm not always a fan of such a warning because it discourages people to give it a try. I respect the decision of the author, though. ---------------------------------------- Misc #17399: Are endless methods experimental? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17399#change-89372 * Author: zverok (Victor Shepelev) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- They are marked as such in NEWS, but an attempt to define one doesn't produce a warning (unlike other features marked this way, like one-line pattern-matching or find patterns) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>