[#101179] Spectre Mitigations — Amel <amel.smajic@...>
Hi there!
5 messages
2020/12/01
[#101180] Re: Spectre Mitigations
— Chris Seaton <chris@...>
2020/12/01
I wouldn’t recommend using Ruby to run in-process untrusted code in the first place. Are people doing that?
[#101694] Ruby 3.0.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
We are pleased to announce the release of Ruby 3.0.0. From 2015 we
4 messages
2020/12/25
[ruby-core:101304] [Ruby master Bug#17374] Refined methods aren't visible from a refinement's module
From:
marcandre-ruby-core@...
Date:
2020-12-08 04:04:26 UTC
List:
ruby-core #101304
Issue #17374 has been updated by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune). shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote in #note-9: > I don't recommend module inclusion to define refined methods. Indeed! The question remains: if it's a bad idea to `include/prepend` modules inside a `refine` block, could we not make it a good idea? Would it be technically difficult to duplicate the methods in the included module, import them and active them in the refinement? ---------------------------------------- Bug #17374: Refined methods aren't visible from a refinement's module https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17374#change-88992 * Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: shugo (Shugo Maeda) * Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>