[#101179] Spectre Mitigations — Amel <amel.smajic@...>
Hi there!
5 messages
2020/12/01
[#101180] Re: Spectre Mitigations
— Chris Seaton <chris@...>
2020/12/01
I wouldn’t recommend using Ruby to run in-process untrusted code in the first place. Are people doing that?
[#101694] Ruby 3.0.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
We are pleased to announce the release of Ruby 3.0.0. From 2015 we
4 messages
2020/12/25
[ruby-core:101497] [Ruby master Misc#17399] Are endless methods experimental?
From:
eregontp@...
Date:
2020-12-17 13:54:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #101497
Issue #17399 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). I think a warning would better, especially since there were quite a few changes regarding what was accepted after the `=`. Also, they purely seem redundant to me and I guess to others, so maybe they might be removed one day like the pipeline operator? We should warn then if either of these is a possibility (either being removed or changing what's accepted after the `=`). ---------------------------------------- Misc #17399: Are endless methods experimental? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17399#change-89277 * Author: zverok (Victor Shepelev) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- They are marked as such in NEWS, but an attempt to define one doesn't produce a warning (unlike other features marked this way, like one-line pattern-matching or find patterns) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>