[#101179] Spectre Mitigations — Amel <amel.smajic@...>
Hi there!
5 messages
2020/12/01
[#101180] Re: Spectre Mitigations
— Chris Seaton <chris@...>
2020/12/01
I wouldn’t recommend using Ruby to run in-process untrusted code in the first place. Are people doing that?
[#101694] Ruby 3.0.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
We are pleased to announce the release of Ruby 3.0.0. From 2015 we
4 messages
2020/12/25
[ruby-core:101273] [Ruby master Bug#17366] Ractor odd issue with timeout + receive + sleep + take
From:
ko1@...
Date:
2020-12-07 00:22:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #101273
Issue #17366 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
I can confirm with it:
```ruby
r = Ractor.new {
begin
pth = Thread.current
Thread.new{ pth.kill }.join
rescue => e
p e
end
}
p r.take
```
----------------------------------------
Bug #17366: Ractor odd issue with timeout + receive + sleep + take
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17366#change-88953
* Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
* ruby -v: ruby 3.0.0dev (2020-11-30T10:06:25Z master 89774a938a) [x86_64-darwin18]
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I believe the following behavior is incorrect:
```
ruby -r timeout -e 'r = Ractor.new { Timeout.timeout(0.1) { sleep(1) } rescue :timeout }; p r.take'
# => :timeout (ok)
ruby -r timeout -e 'r = Ractor.new { Timeout.timeout(0.1) { sleep(1) } rescue :timeout }; sleep(0.2); p r.take'
# => :timeout (ok)
ruby -r timeout -e 'r = Ractor.new { Timeout.timeout(0.1) { Ractor.receive } rescue :timeout }; p r.take'
# => :timeout (ok)
ruby -r timeout -e 'r = Ractor.new { Timeout.timeout(0.1) { Ractor.receive } rescue :timeout }; sleep(0.2); p r.take'
<internal:ractor>:130:in `take': The outgoing-port is already closed (Ractor::ClosedError) # => not ok
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>