[#101179] Spectre Mitigations — Amel <amel.smajic@...>
Hi there!
5 messages
2020/12/01
[#101694] Ruby 3.0.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
V2UgYXJlIHBsZWFzZWQgdG8gYW5ub3VuY2UgdGhlIHJlbGVhc2Ugb2YgUnVieSAzLjAuMC4gRnJv
4 messages
2020/12/25
[ruby-core:101232] Re: [Ruby master Feature#17342] Hash#fetch_set
From:
Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Date:
2020-12-03 22:57:38 UTC
List:
ruby-core #101232
I=E2=80=99m mostly doing Elixir these days, and one of the caching modules =
I use
has as its main interface `fetch_or_set`, so I think that=E2=80=99s the bes=
t choice
if this is present. On the other hand, Nobu=E2=80=99s refinement implementa=
tion
looks pretty good (and I say this not using refinements yet, even though
they=E2=80=99ve been around for a while).
-a
```
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM <eregontp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Issue #17342 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
>
>
> shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) wrote in #note-13:
> > Yes I=E2=80=99m quite sure he is dead serious. There are idiots who w=
rite
> nonsense codes. As a language ruby has to be fool-proof.
>
> I think such semantics (calling #hash only once) could be part of the
> method documentation.
> OTOH calling `#hash` twice is probably not very expensive, and for some
> cases (e.g. Integer, String) can be optimized by a JIT or by memoizing th=
e
> hash on the instance.
>
> I don't like the name `fetch_set` much (does it fetch a Set?).
> I think `fetch_or_set` or `cache` are better.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #17342: Hash#fetch_set
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17342#change-88908
>
> * Author: MaxLap (Maxime Lapointe)
> * Status: Open
> * Priority: Normal
> ----------------------------------------
> I would like to propose adding the `fetch_set` method to `Hash`. It
> behaves just like `fetch`, but when using the default value (2nd argument
> or the block), it also sets the value in the Hash for the given key.
>
> We often use the pattern `cache[key] ||=3D calculation`. This pattern
> however has a problem when the calculation could return false or nil, as =
in
> those case, the calculation is repeated each time.
>
> I believe the best practice in that case is:
>
> ```ruby
> cache.fetch(key) { cache[key] =3D calculation }
> ```
>
> With my suggestion, it would be:
>
> ```ruby
> cache.fetch_set(key) { calculation }
> ```
>
> In these examples, each part is very short, so the `fetch` case is still
> clean. But as each part gets longer, the need to repeat cache[key] become=
s
> more friction.
>
> Here is a more realistic example:
>
> ```ruby
> # Also using the key argument to the block to avoid repeating the
> # long symbol, adding some indirection
> RequestStore.store.fetch(:monitor_value_is_delayed?) do |key|
> RequestStore.store[key] =3D !MonitorValue.where('date >=3D ?', Time.now=
-
> 5.minutes).exists?
> end
>
> RequestStore.store.fetch_set(:monitor_value_is_delayed?) do
> !MonitorValue.where('date >=3D ?', Time.now - 5.minutes).exists?
> end
> ```
>
> There is a precedent for such a method: Python has it, but with a quite
> confusing name: `setdefault(key, default_value)`. This does not set a
> default for the whole dictionary as the name would make you think, it
> really just does what is proposed here.
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#dict.setdefault
>
>
>
> --
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=3Dunsubscrib=
e>
> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>
>
--=20
Austin Ziegler =E2=80=A2 halostatue@gmail.com =E2=80=A2 austin@halostatue.c=
a
http://www.halostatue.ca/ =E2=80=A2 http://twitter.com/halostatue
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>