[#389739] Ruby Challenge — teresa nuagen <unguyen90@...>

Here is a ruby challenge for all you computer science lovers out there,

22 messages 2011/11/05
[#389769] Re: Ruby Challenge — "Jonan S." <jonanscheffler@...> 2011/11/05

Totally unrelated to any husker computer science programs right? Like

[#389905] Re: Ruby Challenge — Stephen Ramsay <sramsay.unl@...> 2011/11/09

Jonan S. wrote in post #1030330:

[#389907] Re: Ruby Challenge — aseret nuagen <unguyen90@...> 2011/11/09

> You mean like the professor for the course? Because that would be me .

[#389915] Re: Ruby Challenge — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/11/09

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:52 AM, aseret nuagen <unguyen90@aim.com> wrote:

[#389792] Tricky DSL, how to do it? — Intransition <transfire@...>

I'd want to write a DSL such that a surface method_missing catches

18 messages 2011/11/06

[#389858] Compiling Ruby Inline C code - resolving errors — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

I am trying to get this Ruby inline C code http://pastie.org/2825882 to

12 messages 2011/11/08

[#389928] Forming a Ruby meetup group... — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...>

Where I work we have a local Ruby group that used to meet up, until the

12 messages 2011/11/09

[#389950] The faster way to read files — "Noé Alejandro" <casanejo@...>

Does anybody know which is the fastest way to read a file? Lets say

18 messages 2011/11/09

[#390064] referring to version numbers in a gem — Chad Perrin <code@...>

How do I specify and access a gem's version number within the code of the

28 messages 2011/11/11

[#390238] RVM problem, plz help — Misha Ognev <b1368810@...>

Hi, I have this problem:

15 messages 2011/11/16

[#390308] any command line tools for querying yaml files — Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@...>

(Sorry, this is not exactly a ruby question).

11 messages 2011/11/18

[#390338] Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...>

I've literally JUST downloaded ruby from rubyinstaller.org.

21 messages 2011/11/19
[#390342] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...> 2011/11/19

OK thank you, I uninstalled & reinstalled, checking the three boxes at

[#390343] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Ian M. Asaff" <ian.asaff@...> 2011/11/19

did you type "irb" first to bring up the ruby command prompt?

[#391154] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Hussain A." <hahmad@...> 2011/12/12

Hi all,

[#391165] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/12

Hussain A. wrote in post #1036281:

[#390374] Principle of Best Principles — Intransition <transfire@...>

I seem to run into a couple of design issue a lot and I never know what is

16 messages 2011/11/20

[#390396] how to call Function argument into another ruby script. — hari mahesh <harismahesh@...>

Consider I have a ruby file called library.rb.

10 messages 2011/11/21

[#390496] How to make 1.9.2 my default version using RVM — Fily Salas <fs_tigre@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2011/11/24

[#390535] Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...>

Well, first of all, I'm new to Ruby, and to this forum. So, hello. :)

39 messages 2011/11/25
[#390580] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2011/11/27

Hi,

[#390593] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...> 2011/11/27

Joao Pedrosa wrote in post #1033884:

[#390600] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

A big gain can be had by disabling the garbage collector. Here is my best

[#390601] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

I've thrown various solutions up on github here:

[#390689] Stupid question — James Gallagher <lollyproductions@...>

Hi everyone.

22 messages 2011/11/30

Re: Loading a faulty ruby file - forcing this

From: Marc Heiler <shevegen@...>
Date: 2011-11-29 16:45:53 UTC
List: ruby-talk #390668
> You could hook into Object#method_missing and
> Object.const_missing to handle NameErrors before
> they happen, although I'd try to redesign my code
> in any possible way before resorting to such methods.

Hmmm. My approach would only work easily if I'd
be able to continue loading the whole ruby file
in question. I am not sure I understood this solution
well though - I have to handle NameErrors *before*
they happen?

> An exception always immediately stops execution at the
> point where it is thrown and unwinds the stack until it
> finds a handler (or the process terminates).

Oh I see! Would be neat to be able to suppress that
when one wants to, with the rest of the code continued
to be read and interpreted.

> Basically you could wrap every individual section with
> "begin rescue end". Then such a section would be the
> smallest part which could fail. Alternatively you could
> split the file in multiple parts and have a specific
> implementation of "load" which ignores errors:

> def load_ignorant(s)
>  load(s)
> rescue Exception
>   # eat it
> end

Hmm you mean wrap the file into different smaller files
and load these? Probably feasible. I'd however like to
keep a constraint as in having a large ruby file available
already. It also sounds like too much work to split the
file in question up.

> Why do you want to do that? That sounds like a bad plan
> to me since you won't notice any issues and your
> application's state is unclear.

The demo code in question just shows that the ruby file
only has invalid calls to non-existent methods. But
otherwise, it is fine. I would argue that by definition
there can not be any issues with it (from that faulty
ruby file) because after all it is faulty anyway and
there are only two states for it - either it contains
valid ruby code or it is invalid (in which case it should
be ignored).

Consider it a crazy wish for purposely sloppy programming
where perfection can stop at 40% rather than go for the
usual 100%.

As for the reason why I want to do that - I want to run
invalid code which could become partially valid, rather
than stopped when encountering an Exception.

Consider it as something that will never find its way
into any program.

If it is too cumbersome to achieve though then this idea
already falls short.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

In This Thread