[#389739] Ruby Challenge — teresa nuagen <unguyen90@...>

Here is a ruby challenge for all you computer science lovers out there,

22 messages 2011/11/05
[#389769] Re: Ruby Challenge — "Jonan S." <jonanscheffler@...> 2011/11/05

Totally unrelated to any husker computer science programs right? Like

[#389905] Re: Ruby Challenge — Stephen Ramsay <sramsay.unl@...> 2011/11/09

Jonan S. wrote in post #1030330:

[#389907] Re: Ruby Challenge — aseret nuagen <unguyen90@...> 2011/11/09

> You mean like the professor for the course? Because that would be me .

[#389915] Re: Ruby Challenge — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/11/09

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:52 AM, aseret nuagen <unguyen90@aim.com> wrote:

[#389792] Tricky DSL, how to do it? — Intransition <transfire@...>

I'd want to write a DSL such that a surface method_missing catches

18 messages 2011/11/06

[#389858] Compiling Ruby Inline C code - resolving errors — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

I am trying to get this Ruby inline C code http://pastie.org/2825882 to

12 messages 2011/11/08

[#389928] Forming a Ruby meetup group... — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...>

Where I work we have a local Ruby group that used to meet up, until the

12 messages 2011/11/09

[#389950] The faster way to read files — "Noé Alejandro" <casanejo@...>

Does anybody know which is the fastest way to read a file? Lets say

18 messages 2011/11/09

[#390064] referring to version numbers in a gem — Chad Perrin <code@...>

How do I specify and access a gem's version number within the code of the

28 messages 2011/11/11

[#390238] RVM problem, plz help — Misha Ognev <b1368810@...>

Hi, I have this problem:

15 messages 2011/11/16

[#390308] any command line tools for querying yaml files — Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@...>

(Sorry, this is not exactly a ruby question).

11 messages 2011/11/18

[#390338] Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...>

I've literally JUST downloaded ruby from rubyinstaller.org.

21 messages 2011/11/19
[#390342] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...> 2011/11/19

OK thank you, I uninstalled & reinstalled, checking the three boxes at

[#390343] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Ian M. Asaff" <ian.asaff@...> 2011/11/19

did you type "irb" first to bring up the ruby command prompt?

[#391154] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Hussain A." <hahmad@...> 2011/12/12

Hi all,

[#391165] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/12

Hussain A. wrote in post #1036281:

[#390374] Principle of Best Principles — Intransition <transfire@...>

I seem to run into a couple of design issue a lot and I never know what is

16 messages 2011/11/20

[#390396] how to call Function argument into another ruby script. — hari mahesh <harismahesh@...>

Consider I have a ruby file called library.rb.

10 messages 2011/11/21

[#390496] How to make 1.9.2 my default version using RVM — Fily Salas <fs_tigre@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2011/11/24

[#390535] Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...>

Well, first of all, I'm new to Ruby, and to this forum. So, hello. :)

39 messages 2011/11/25
[#390580] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2011/11/27

Hi,

[#390593] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...> 2011/11/27

Joao Pedrosa wrote in post #1033884:

[#390600] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

A big gain can be had by disabling the garbage collector. Here is my best

[#390601] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

I've thrown various solutions up on github here:

[#390650] Loading a faulty ruby file - forcing this — Marc Heiler <shevegen@...>

Hi.

10 messages 2011/11/29

[#390689] Stupid question — James Gallagher <lollyproductions@...>

Hi everyone.

22 messages 2011/11/30

Re: Problem on hash with default value

From: Jes俍 Gabriel y Gal疣 <jgabrielygalan@...>
Date: 2011-11-17 17:52:47 UTC
List: ruby-talk #390280
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Florent G. <florent2@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I face the following issue with a hash having an empty array as default
> value.
>
> I don't how to describe it in English, here is an illustrative code:
>
> hash = Hash.new Array.new
>
> hash[:a] = [1]
>
> hash[:b] << 2
>
> puts hash[:b]
> # => returns [2]
>
> puts hash.keys
> # => returns [:a], not [:a, :b] ?
>
> hash[:b] is set to [2] but I don't understand why hash.keys does not
> include :b.

The reason is that the Hash constructor you are using uses the object
you pass, in your case, Array.new, to return when you access a
non-existing key. But, it doesn't assign the array to the key. You
have to do it yourself. One way is to use the default proc:

h = Hash.new {|hash, k| hash[k] = Array.new}

This will create a new array *and* assign it to a key, whenever you
access a non-existing key:

ruby-1.8.7-p334 :001 > h = Hash.new {|hash, k| hash[k] = Array.new}
 => {}
ruby-1.8.7-p334 :002 > h[:a]
 => []
ruby-1.8.7-p334 :003 > h
 => {:a=>[]}

Also, keep in mind that the other constructor you were using will
return the same Array instance to all non-existing keys:

ruby-1.8.7-p334 :004 > h = Hash.new Array.new
 => {}
ruby-1.8.7-p334 :005 > h[:a]
 => []
ruby-1.8.7-p334 :006 > h[:a] << 2
 => [2]
ruby-1.8.7-p334 :007 > h[:a]
 => [2]
ruby-1.8.7-p334 :008 > h[:b]
 => [2]


Jesus.

In This Thread