From: Sylvester Keil Date: 2011-11-07T05:09:11+09:00 Subject: Re: ruby instance inside Textmate bundle Maybe I'm missing something here, but since your users will be strictly TextMate users (I presume), I'm not sure that they would appreciate a bundled Ruby version, as they probably already have a couple of Ruby versions installed anyway. Or does your bundle target a completely different audience which, in all likelihood, doesn't work with Ruby at all? On Nov 6, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Carina C. Zona wrote: > RVM places rubies, gems, et al within ~/.rvm. In that respect, it is > physically portable. > > User installation of RVM itself amounts to a three line snippet for > them to copy/paste into Terminal. If you want to take even that small > step out of the user's hands, visit RVM's irc channel. The author and > several of the maintainers generously make themselves available nearly > every day. They can better advise you on the issues you'll need to > consider. > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote: >> C. Zona wrote in post #1030343: >>> http://beginrescueend.com/rvm/install/ >>> >>> But any ruby you package with the bundle is still going to need to be >>> compiled for whichever architecture/OS combo it's ultimately run on. >>> If that's likely to be vary, using a package manager is usually the >>> better way to handle dependencies. Consider Homebrew, Macports, or >>> Fink. >> >> >> I have seen that, but I don't understand how that helps me embed ruby >> within a bundle. It seems like something every user of the bundle would >> need to use to set up a version of ruby, which is what I am trying to >> avoid. Can you elaborate? >> >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> >> > > > > -- > Carina >