[#389739] Ruby Challenge — teresa nuagen <unguyen90@...>

Here is a ruby challenge for all you computer science lovers out there,

22 messages 2011/11/05
[#389769] Re: Ruby Challenge — "Jonan S." <jonanscheffler@...> 2011/11/05

Totally unrelated to any husker computer science programs right? Like

[#389905] Re: Ruby Challenge — Stephen Ramsay <sramsay.unl@...> 2011/11/09

Jonan S. wrote in post #1030330:

[#389907] Re: Ruby Challenge — aseret nuagen <unguyen90@...> 2011/11/09

> You mean like the professor for the course? Because that would be me .

[#389915] Re: Ruby Challenge — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/11/09

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:52 AM, aseret nuagen <unguyen90@aim.com> wrote:

[#389792] Tricky DSL, how to do it? — Intransition <transfire@...>

I'd want to write a DSL such that a surface method_missing catches

18 messages 2011/11/06

[#389858] Compiling Ruby Inline C code - resolving errors — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

I am trying to get this Ruby inline C code http://pastie.org/2825882 to

12 messages 2011/11/08

[#389928] Forming a Ruby meetup group... — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...>

Where I work we have a local Ruby group that used to meet up, until the

12 messages 2011/11/09

[#389950] The faster way to read files — "Noé Alejandro" <casanejo@...>

Does anybody know which is the fastest way to read a file? Lets say

18 messages 2011/11/09

[#390064] referring to version numbers in a gem — Chad Perrin <code@...>

How do I specify and access a gem's version number within the code of the

28 messages 2011/11/11

[#390238] RVM problem, plz help — Misha Ognev <b1368810@...>

Hi, I have this problem:

15 messages 2011/11/16

[#390308] any command line tools for querying yaml files — Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@...>

(Sorry, this is not exactly a ruby question).

11 messages 2011/11/18

[#390338] Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...>

I've literally JUST downloaded ruby from rubyinstaller.org.

21 messages 2011/11/19
[#390342] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...> 2011/11/19

OK thank you, I uninstalled & reinstalled, checking the three boxes at

[#390343] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Ian M. Asaff" <ian.asaff@...> 2011/11/19

did you type "irb" first to bring up the ruby command prompt?

[#391154] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Hussain A." <hahmad@...> 2011/12/12

Hi all,

[#391165] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/12

Hussain A. wrote in post #1036281:

[#390374] Principle of Best Principles — Intransition <transfire@...>

I seem to run into a couple of design issue a lot and I never know what is

16 messages 2011/11/20

[#390396] how to call Function argument into another ruby script. — hari mahesh <harismahesh@...>

Consider I have a ruby file called library.rb.

10 messages 2011/11/21

[#390496] How to make 1.9.2 my default version using RVM — Fily Salas <fs_tigre@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2011/11/24

[#390535] Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...>

Well, first of all, I'm new to Ruby, and to this forum. So, hello. :)

39 messages 2011/11/25
[#390580] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2011/11/27

Hi,

[#390593] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...> 2011/11/27

Joao Pedrosa wrote in post #1033884:

[#390600] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

A big gain can be had by disabling the garbage collector. Here is my best

[#390601] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

I've thrown various solutions up on github here:

[#390650] Loading a faulty ruby file - forcing this — Marc Heiler <shevegen@...>

Hi.

10 messages 2011/11/29

[#390689] Stupid question — James Gallagher <lollyproductions@...>

Hi everyone.

22 messages 2011/11/30

Re: Loading a faulty ruby file - forcing this

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2011-11-29 13:56:28 UTC
List: ruby-talk #390656
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Marc Heiler <shevegen@linuxmail.org> wrot=
e:
> Hi.
>
> Consider you have two ruby files.
>
> file1.rb:
> ---------------------------------------------------
> require 'pp'
> RUBY_FILE =3D './file2.rb'
>
> begin
> =A0load RUBY_FILE
> rescue NameError =3D> error
> =A0# pp error # Do not report the error here. Be silent.
> end
>
> # Now we call the two methods defined in file2.rb
> foo()
> bar()
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> file2.rb:
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> def foo
> =A0puts 'This is from foo()'
> end
>
> # Create an error on purpose here.
> joe_doe()
>
> def bar # The second method.
> =A0puts 'This is from bar()'
> end
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Note - I use the parens () at bar() to make it more
> explicit and illustrate my question.
>
> If you run file1.rb, an error occurs:
>
> undefined method `bar' for main:Object (NoMethodError)
>
>
> The method call to foo() works.
>
> If you look at the content of file2.rb, you can see that
> the method definition first has foo(), then a method
> call to a method that does not exist (on purpose), and
> then the method definition to bar()
>
> Ruby apparently stops processing file2.rb when it
> encounters a NameError exception.

Of course.  An exception always immediately stops execution at the
point where it is thrown and unwinds the stack until it finds a
handler (or the process terminates).

> My question is:
>
> - Is there a way to force or otherwise cause Ruby to continue
> reading the second file? I am in control of the ruby files so
> I can use eval without a problem.

Basically you could wrap every individual section with "begin rescue
end".  Then such a section would be the smallest part which could
fail.  Alternatively you could split the file in multiple parts and
have a specific implementation of "load" which ignores errors:

def load_ignorant(s)
  load(s)
rescue Exception
    # eat it
end

> What I would like to achieve is to let ruby read a file
> and treat it as a ruby file, but if it encounters errors,
> it would disregard these errors, and continue processing
> them.
>
> In a way, I'd need a faulty ruby loader that ignores errors
> when instructed.
>
> Right now, in the code above, I can not achieve this, as
> ruby stops the very moment it encounters an invalid method
> call. How could I continue to process that faulty file?

Why do you want to do that?  That sounds like a bad plan to me since
you won't notice any issues and your application's state is unclear.

Kind regards

robert

--=20
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

In This Thread