[#389739] Ruby Challenge — teresa nuagen <unguyen90@...>

Here is a ruby challenge for all you computer science lovers out there,

22 messages 2011/11/05
[#389769] Re: Ruby Challenge — "Jonan S." <jonanscheffler@...> 2011/11/05

Totally unrelated to any husker computer science programs right? Like

[#389905] Re: Ruby Challenge — Stephen Ramsay <sramsay.unl@...> 2011/11/09

Jonan S. wrote in post #1030330:

[#389907] Re: Ruby Challenge — aseret nuagen <unguyen90@...> 2011/11/09

> You mean like the professor for the course? Because that would be me .

[#389915] Re: Ruby Challenge — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/11/09

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:52 AM, aseret nuagen <unguyen90@aim.com> wrote:

[#389792] Tricky DSL, how to do it? — Intransition <transfire@...>

I'd want to write a DSL such that a surface method_missing catches

18 messages 2011/11/06

[#389858] Compiling Ruby Inline C code - resolving errors — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

I am trying to get this Ruby inline C code http://pastie.org/2825882 to

12 messages 2011/11/08

[#389928] Forming a Ruby meetup group... — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...>

Where I work we have a local Ruby group that used to meet up, until the

12 messages 2011/11/09

[#389950] The faster way to read files — "Noé Alejandro" <casanejo@...>

Does anybody know which is the fastest way to read a file? Lets say

18 messages 2011/11/09

[#390064] referring to version numbers in a gem — Chad Perrin <code@...>

How do I specify and access a gem's version number within the code of the

28 messages 2011/11/11

[#390238] RVM problem, plz help — Misha Ognev <b1368810@...>

Hi, I have this problem:

15 messages 2011/11/16

[#390308] any command line tools for querying yaml files — Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@...>

(Sorry, this is not exactly a ruby question).

11 messages 2011/11/18

[#390338] Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...>

I've literally JUST downloaded ruby from rubyinstaller.org.

21 messages 2011/11/19
[#390342] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...> 2011/11/19

OK thank you, I uninstalled & reinstalled, checking the three boxes at

[#390343] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Ian M. Asaff" <ian.asaff@...> 2011/11/19

did you type "irb" first to bring up the ruby command prompt?

[#391154] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Hussain A." <hahmad@...> 2011/12/12

Hi all,

[#391165] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/12

Hussain A. wrote in post #1036281:

[#390374] Principle of Best Principles — Intransition <transfire@...>

I seem to run into a couple of design issue a lot and I never know what is

16 messages 2011/11/20

[#390396] how to call Function argument into another ruby script. — hari mahesh <harismahesh@...>

Consider I have a ruby file called library.rb.

10 messages 2011/11/21

[#390496] How to make 1.9.2 my default version using RVM — Fily Salas <fs_tigre@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2011/11/24

[#390535] Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...>

Well, first of all, I'm new to Ruby, and to this forum. So, hello. :)

39 messages 2011/11/25
[#390580] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2011/11/27

Hi,

[#390593] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...> 2011/11/27

Joao Pedrosa wrote in post #1033884:

[#390600] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

A big gain can be had by disabling the garbage collector. Here is my best

[#390601] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

I've thrown various solutions up on github here:

[#390650] Loading a faulty ruby file - forcing this — Marc Heiler <shevegen@...>

Hi.

10 messages 2011/11/29

[#390689] Stupid question — James Gallagher <lollyproductions@...>

Hi everyone.

22 messages 2011/11/30

Re: referring to version numbers in a gem

From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2011-11-12 00:09:32 UTC
List: ruby-talk #390086
On Nov 11, 2011, at 14:04 , Chad Perrin wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:28:15AM +0900, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> How do I specify and access a gem's version number within the code of =
the
>> gem itself?  For example:
>>=20
>> 1. I write a library.
>> 2. I write a command line utility that uses that library.
>> 3. The utility uses OptionParser, with a --version option.
>> 4. I package the things up inside a gem.
>>=20
>> What's the best way to specify the version number and give the code
>> executed when the --version argument is supplied the ability to =
access
>> that version number?
>=20
> For now, I'm going with the following.
>=20
> lib/gem_name.rb:
>=20
>    module GemName
>      @version =3D Gem::Version.new 'N.N.N'

Just use a plain string here. No reason to drag in Gem::Version at this =
point (rubygems is still pretty heavy). Also, a constant would be a =
better fit.

>      def self.version; @version; end

There's no need for a class method here. Since the version string really =
is constant (for a given install), and there isn't any morphing you're =
going to do, stick with a const.

>      . . .
>    end
>=20
> gem_name.gemspec:
>=20
>    load 'lib/gem_name.rb'
>=20
>    Gem::Specification.new do |s|
>      s.version =3D GemName.version.to_s

s.version =3D GemName::VERSION

>      . . .
>    end
>=20
> bin/gemname:
>=20
>    . . .
>=20
>      opts.on_tail('--version', help_text[:version]) do
>        puts "#{0} #{GemName.version} . . ."

puts "#{0} #{GemName::VERSION} . . ."

>      end
>    end
>=20
> If anyone sees any problems with that approach, I'd like to hear about
> it, but it seems to be working well enough for the moment.

There's nothing _wrong_ with it, but it does do a bit more than it =
needs. Using a constant in the main class/module (I don't see the value =
in separating out the version to it's own file) and then referring to =
that everywhere is the DRYest way we could come up with when we were =
figuring this stuff out. It's the pattern that hoe uses and what sow =
spits out when you create a new project with it.=

In This Thread