[#389739] Ruby Challenge — teresa nuagen <unguyen90@...>

Here is a ruby challenge for all you computer science lovers out there,

22 messages 2011/11/05
[#389769] Re: Ruby Challenge — "Jonan S." <jonanscheffler@...> 2011/11/05

Totally unrelated to any husker computer science programs right? Like

[#389905] Re: Ruby Challenge — Stephen Ramsay <sramsay.unl@...> 2011/11/09

Jonan S. wrote in post #1030330:

[#389907] Re: Ruby Challenge — aseret nuagen <unguyen90@...> 2011/11/09

> You mean like the professor for the course? Because that would be me .

[#389915] Re: Ruby Challenge — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/11/09

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:52 AM, aseret nuagen <unguyen90@aim.com> wrote:

[#389792] Tricky DSL, how to do it? — Intransition <transfire@...>

I'd want to write a DSL such that a surface method_missing catches

18 messages 2011/11/06

[#389858] Compiling Ruby Inline C code - resolving errors — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

I am trying to get this Ruby inline C code http://pastie.org/2825882 to

12 messages 2011/11/08

[#389928] Forming a Ruby meetup group... — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...>

Where I work we have a local Ruby group that used to meet up, until the

12 messages 2011/11/09

[#389950] The faster way to read files — "Noé Alejandro" <casanejo@...>

Does anybody know which is the fastest way to read a file? Lets say

18 messages 2011/11/09

[#390064] referring to version numbers in a gem — Chad Perrin <code@...>

How do I specify and access a gem's version number within the code of the

28 messages 2011/11/11

[#390238] RVM problem, plz help — Misha Ognev <b1368810@...>

Hi, I have this problem:

15 messages 2011/11/16

[#390308] any command line tools for querying yaml files — Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@...>

(Sorry, this is not exactly a ruby question).

11 messages 2011/11/18

[#390338] Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...>

I've literally JUST downloaded ruby from rubyinstaller.org.

21 messages 2011/11/19
[#390342] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Otto Dydakt <ottodydakt@...> 2011/11/19

OK thank you, I uninstalled & reinstalled, checking the three boxes at

[#390343] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Ian M. Asaff" <ian.asaff@...> 2011/11/19

did you type "irb" first to bring up the ruby command prompt?

[#391154] Re: Newbie - cmd question — "Hussain A." <hahmad@...> 2011/12/12

Hi all,

[#391165] Re: Newbie - cmd question — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/12

Hussain A. wrote in post #1036281:

[#390374] Principle of Best Principles — Intransition <transfire@...>

I seem to run into a couple of design issue a lot and I never know what is

16 messages 2011/11/20

[#390396] how to call Function argument into another ruby script. — hari mahesh <harismahesh@...>

Consider I have a ruby file called library.rb.

10 messages 2011/11/21

[#390496] How to make 1.9.2 my default version using RVM — Fily Salas <fs_tigre@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2011/11/24

[#390535] Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...>

Well, first of all, I'm new to Ruby, and to this forum. So, hello. :)

39 messages 2011/11/25
[#390580] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2011/11/27

Hi,

[#390593] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...> 2011/11/27

Joao Pedrosa wrote in post #1033884:

[#390600] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

A big gain can be had by disabling the garbage collector. Here is my best

[#390601] Re: Is high-speed sorting impossible with Ruby? — Douglas Seifert <doug@...> 2011/11/27

I've thrown various solutions up on github here:

[#390689] Stupid question — James Gallagher <lollyproductions@...>

Hi everyone.

22 messages 2011/11/30

Re: www.ruby-lang.org is back

From: Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...>
Date: 2011-11-19 11:12:52 UTC
List: ruby-talk #390355
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:04 PM, R. Kumar <sentinel1879@gmail.com> wrote:

> > If I understand correctly:
> >
> > * 1.9.3-p0 is the current release version.  The -p0 means "patch number
> >   zero".
> >
> > * 1.9.3-head is the cutting-edge version in the main development
> >   repository, which may well include some incomplete feature additions
> > or
> >   changes.
> >
> > Someone correct me if I'm mistaken.
>
> I tried setting rvm's default to 1.9.3 without mentioning "-head"
> explicitly. Instead of using the -head installed already, it told me
> something like "you don't have -p0 installed." So is rvm always aware of
> the latest stable version?
>

rvm follows the latest "stable" version with a very small delay.

You can see which version rvm selects by default as follows:

$ rvm get latest
$ rvm reload
$ rvm list known
...
[ruby-]1.9.3-preview1
[ruby-]1.9.3-rc1
[ruby-]1.9.3[-p0]
[ruby-]1.9.3-head

The [-p0] indicates that at this time, the -p0 patchlevel is the
default patch level for ruby 1.9.3.

Before 1.9.3[-p0] , 1.9.3[-rc1] was the default for a certain time
(it changed from -rc1 to -p0 around 3 Nov 2011).

So yes, if you say e.g.

$ rvm use 1.9.3   # indicating 1.9.3-rc1 in October 2011

this was 1.9.3[-rc1] for a certain time, but when 1.9.3[-p0] comes out
and becomes the default, the same command

$ rvm use 1.9.3 # indicating 1.9.3-p0 now since Nov 2011

will suddenly fail if you had not yet installed 1.9.3-p0.

You can also upgrade all your existing gemsets from 1.9.3-rc1 to 1.9.3-p0
with

$ rvm upgrade ruby-1.9.3-rc1 ruby-1.9.3  # implicit ruby-1.9.3 is
ruby-1.9.3-p0

HTH,

Peter

In This Thread