From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2011-11-14T11:02:38+09:00
Subject: Re: BE

------=_Part_711_28181473.1321236154911
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_712_25209776.1321236154912"

------=_Part_712_25209776.1321236154912
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



On Sunday, November 13, 2011 8:45:20 PM UTC-5, Martin DeMello wrote:
>
> I tried using distributed bugtracking for a bit (ditz, to be precise).
> It sounded like a great idea to start with, but I found after a bit
> that I really wanted a centralised bug database.
>
> martin
>
I agree. What I really want is both. I think it would be awesome if pushing 
bugs via BE landed them on GitHub's issue tracker and vice-verse.




------=_Part_712_25209776.1321236154912
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<br><br>On Sunday, November 13, 2011 8:45:20 PM UTC-5, Martin DeMello wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">I tried using distributed bugtracking for a bit (ditz, to be precise).<br>It sounded like a great idea to start with, but I found after a bit<br>that I really wanted a centralised bug database.<p>martin</p></blockquote><div>I agree. What I really want is both. I think it would be awesome if pushing bugs via BE landed them on GitHub's issue tracker and vice-verse.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><p></p><p></p><p></p></blockquote>
------=_Part_712_25209776.1321236154912--

------=_Part_711_28181473.1321236154911--