[ruby-core:98655] [Ruby master Misc#16933] DevelopersMeeting20200618Japan

Issue #16933 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).


* [Bug #9573] descendants of a module don't gain its future ancestors, but descendants of a class, do (jeremyevans0)
  * Support for Module#include was implemented 3 months ago
  * Bugs prevented support for Module#prepend at the time
  * I've since fixed all bugs
  * Implementing support for Module#prepend is now straightforward and causes no test failures, is it OK to merge the patch?
* [Feature #14267] Lazy proc allocation introduced in #14045 creates regression (jeremyevans0)
  * I added a patch implementing Proc#== and #eql? (previously not implemented, so Object#== and #eql? were used)
  * Do the equalivance conditions I describe make sense, or should more be added?
  * Is it OK to merge the patch?
* [Bug #11669] inconsitent behavior of refining frozen class (jeremyevans0)
  * Refining a frozen class where the refinement adds a method is currently broken.
  * Refinement methods are internal, so I'm not sure we should raise FrozenError in this case
  * Is it OK to merge the patch?
* [Bug #16504] `foo(*args, &args.pop)` should pass all elements of args (jeremyevans0)
  * Bug is due to an optimization that skips duping of args for the splat.
  * I created a patch that fixes the issue in most cases by removing the optimization in those cases.
  * The patch does not remove the optimization in common cases, such as `&local_variable` or `&:symbol`
  * Truly fixing the issue in all cases requires removing the optimization completely.
  * Is it OK to merge the patch?
* [Feature #16470] Issue with nanoseconds in Time#inspect (jeremyevans0)
  * Currently, Time#inspect can display fractional seconds as a rational, which few rational people want.
  * I think Time#inspect should always display fractional seconds as decimal.
  * I have a patch to do this, but it makes Time#inspect the same for Time instances that are not equal.
  * Arbitrary precision for fractional seconds, the benefit of storing nanoseconds as a rational, seems pointless to me.
  * Do we want to keep things as is, merge the patch, or change Time's implementation so fractional seconds are not stored with greater than nanosecond precision?

----------------------------------------
Misc #16933: DevelopersMeeting20200618Japan
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16933#change-85986

* Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
# The next dev meeting

**Date: 2020/06/18 13:00-17:00**
Place/Agenda/Log: https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/DevelopersMeeting20200618Japan.md

- Dev meeting *IS NOT* a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
- Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
- Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
- We will write a log about the discussion to a file or to each ticket in English.
- All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
- The date, time and place are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
- *DO NOT* discuss then on this ticket, please.

# Call for agenda items

If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:

```
* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
  * Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)
```

Example:

```
* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
  * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
```

- Comment deadline: 2020/06/11 (one week before the meeting)
- The format is strict.  We'll use [this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda](https://gist.github.com/mame/b0390509ce1491b43610b9ebb665eb86).  We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
- Your comment is mandatory.  We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[e-mail]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>