[#105544] [Ruby master Feature#18239] Variable Width Allocation: Strings — "peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18239 has been reported by peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu).

18 messages 2021/10/04

[#105566] [Ruby master Bug#18242] Parser makes multiple assignment sad in confusing way — "danh337 (Dan Higgins)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18242 has been reported by danh337 (Dan Higgins).

9 messages 2021/10/06

[#105573] [Ruby master Bug#18243] Ractor.make_shareable does not freeze the receiver of a Proc but allows accessing ivars of it — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18243 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

11 messages 2021/10/06

[#105618] [Ruby master Bug#18249] The ABI version of dev builds of CRuby does not correspond to the ABI — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18249 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

23 messages 2021/10/11

[#105626] [Ruby master Bug#18250] Anonymous variables seem to break `Ractor.make_shareable` — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18250 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

14 messages 2021/10/12

[#105660] [Ruby master Feature#18254] Add an `offset` parameter to String#unpack and String#unpack1 — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18254 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

13 messages 2021/10/18

[#105672] [Ruby master Feature#18256] Change the canonical name of Thread::Mutex, Thread::Queue, Thread::SizedQueue and Thread::ConditionVariable to just Mutex, Queue, SizedQueue and ConditionVariable — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18256 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

6 messages 2021/10/19

[#105692] [Ruby master Bug#18257] SystemTap/DTrace coredump on ppc64le/s390x — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18257 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

22 messages 2021/10/20

[#105781] [Ruby master Misc#18266] DevelopersMeeting20211118Japan — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18266 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

13 messages 2021/10/25

[#105805] [Ruby master Bug#18270] Refinement#{extend_object, append_features, prepend_features} should be removed — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18270 has been reported by shugo (Shugo Maeda).

8 messages 2021/10/26

[#105826] [Ruby master Feature#18273] Class.subclasses — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18273 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

35 messages 2021/10/27

[#105833] [Ruby master Feature#18275] Add an option to define_method to not capture the surrounding environment — "vinistock (Vinicius Stock)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18275 has been reported by vinistock (Vinicius Stock).

11 messages 2021/10/27

[#105853] [Ruby master Feature#18276] `Proc#bind_call(obj)` same as `obj.instance_exec(..., &proc_obj)` — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18276 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

15 messages 2021/10/28

[ruby-core:105760] [Ruby master Feature#16989] Sets: need ♥️

From: "greggzst (Grzegorz Jakubiak)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2021-10-23 21:04:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #105760
Issue #16989 has been updated by greggzst (Grzegorz Jakubiak).


Any update on that?

----------------------------------------
Feature #16989: Sets: need ♥️
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16989#change-94269

* Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: knu (Akinori MUSHA)
----------------------------------------
I am opening a series of feature requests on `Set`, all of them based on this usecase.

The main usecase I have in mind is my recent experience with `RuboCop`. I noticed a big number of frozen arrays being used only to later call `include?` on them. This is `O(n)` instead of `O(1)`.

Trying to convert them to `Set`s causes major compatibility issues, as well as very frustrating situations and some cases that would make them much less efficient.

Because of these incompatibilities, `RuboCop` is in the process of using a custom class based on `Array` with optimized `include?` and `===`. `RuboCop` runs multiple checks on Ruby code. Those checks are called cops. `RuboCop` performance is (IMO) pretty bad and some cops  currently are in `O(n^2)` where n is the size of the code being inspected. Even given these extremely inefficient cops, optimizing the 100+ such arrays (most of which are quite small btw) gave a 5% speed boost.

RuboCop PRs for reference: https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop-ast/pull/29
https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/8133

My experience tells me that there are many other opportunities to use `Set`s that are missed because `Set`s are not builtin, not known enough and have no shorthand notation.

In this issue I'd like to concentrate the discussion on the following request: `Set`s should be core objects, in the same way that `Complex` were not and are now. Some of the upcoming feature requests would be easier (or only possible) to implement were `Set`s builtin.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread