From: Eric Wong Date: 2016-04-27T19:21:08+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:75228] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#11098] Thread-level allocation counting jclark@newrelic.com wrote: > So apparently I didn't have notifications turned on and lost track of this. Sorry! No worries; I wish this place had a reply-to-all convention and encourage emailing each other directly. It would mitigate this Redmine server as a single-point-of-failure. And yes, I miss stuff all the time and absolutely don't mind being emailed directly if I don't respond after a week or two. (not speaking for the rest of ruby-core). > I've rebased this to current trunk and modified it per your > suggestions Eric. How's this look? Anything else I can do to > help this along? LONG2NUM should probably be adjusted to ULL2NUM, since "long" on 32-bit platforms is only 32-bits, not 64. There's no exact U64T2NUM macro/function, but "long long" is 64-bits everywhere nowadays, I think... Other than that, technically it's fine. I don't get to make the final decision as far as public API changes go, though. Unsubscribe: