[#75225] [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7) — k@...
Issue #12324 has been reported by Kazuki Yamaguchi.
6 messages
2016/04/27
[#78693] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
k@rhe.jp wrote:
[#78701] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@...>
2016/12/17
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:31:12AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#78702] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp> wrote:
[ruby-core:75127] [Ruby trunk Misc#12310] ctime vs asctime - Documentation Issue? - http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.3.0/Time.html
From:
mcginn.robert@...
Date:
2016-04-22 10:55:01 UTC
List:
ruby-core #75127
Issue #12310 has been updated by Robert McGinn. Tracker changed from Bug to Misc ---------------------------------------- Misc #12310: ctime vs asctime - Documentation Issue? - http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.3.0/Time.html https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12310#change-58258 * Author: Robert McGinn * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- All, I was working through the Time Class documentation at http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.3.0/Time.html. I noted a potential typo in the example code as per below. ~~~ **ctime** → string click to toggle source Returns a canonical string representation of time. Time.now.**asctime** #=> "Wed Apr 9 08:56:03 2003" ~~~ The example code references a separate method (asctime) as oppose to ctime. Running "methods" on a time object does reference two separate methods:- asctime ctime I did a search and could not find a bug relating to this. Best regards, Robert -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>