[#75225] [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7) — k@...
Issue #12324 has been reported by Kazuki Yamaguchi.
6 messages
2016/04/27
[#78693] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
k@rhe.jp wrote:
[#78701] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@...>
2016/12/17
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:31:12AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#78702] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp> wrote:
[ruby-core:74850] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12262] Anti-loop
From:
Brandon Weaver <keystonelemur@...>
Date:
2016-04-08 07:26:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #74850
[1].each { puts 'looping'; sleep 1; redo }
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:21 AM, <sawadatsuyoshi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Issue #12262 has been reported by Tsuyoshi Sawada.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #12262: Anti-loop
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12262
>
> * Author: Tsuyoshi Sawada
> * Status: Open
> * Priority: Normal
> * Assignee:
> ----------------------------------------
> The `loop` method continues by default, and requires the keyword `break`
> to escape. This is good when the continuing cases are the norm and the
> escaping cases are exceptional:
>
> ~~~RUBY
> loop do
> ...
> if ...
> ...
> elsif ...
> ...
> elsif ...
> ...
> break # breaks on exceptional cases
> elsif ...
> ...
> else
> ...
> end
> end
> ~~~
>
> But when the continuing cases are exceptional and the escaping cases are
> the norm, the construction requires a lot of `break`, and it becomes
> cumbersome:
>
> ~~~RUBY
> loop do
> ...
> if ...
> ...
> break # lot of breaks
> elsif ...
> ...
> break # lot of breaks
> elsif ...
> ...
> break # lot of breaks
> elsif ...
> ...
> else
> ...
> break # lot of breaks
> end
> end
> ~~~
>
> I actually see this use case a lot when user input is asked with
> validation on a command line script.
>
> I request a `loop`-like method that works in the opposite way to `loop`,
> that is, it escapes (i.e., runs only once) by default, and requires a
> keyword to continue (perhaps `next`). The second code above would then be
> written like:
>
> ~~~RUBY
> some_loop_like_method do
> ...
> if ...
> ...
> elsif ...
> ...
> elsif ...
> ...
> elsif ...
> ...
> next # continues on exceptional cases
> else
> ...
> end
> end
> ~~~
>
>
>
>
> --
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>
>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>