[#75225] [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7) — k@...
Issue #12324 has been reported by Kazuki Yamaguchi.
6 messages
2016/04/27
[#78693] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
k@rhe.jp wrote:
[#78701] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@...>
2016/12/17
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:31:12AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#78702] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp> wrote:
[ruby-core:75074] [Ruby trunk Bug#12258] RDoc bug when handling comments in C code examples
From:
sto.mar@...
Date:
2016-04-21 20:48:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #75074
Issue #12258 has been updated by Marcus Stollsteimer.
Also opened an issue for RDoc: https://github.com/rdoc/rdoc/issues/402
----------------------------------------
Bug #12258: RDoc bug when handling comments in C code examples
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12258#change-58198
* Author: Marcus Stollsteimer
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.3.0p0 (2015-12-25 revision 53290) [i686-linux]
* Backport: 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
RDoc fails to correctly convert documentation that includes C example code with `/* ... */` comments.
It does not only produce wrong output for the comment itself (stripping the `/*` and `*/`), but also gets confused with occurences of `*` in completely different parts of the documentation, so that e.g. lists are displayed as code blocks. It appears that `*` at the very beginning of a line triggers a code block under these circumstances.
This affects e.g. http://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/trunk/extension_rdoc.html#label-Check+Data+Type+of+the+VALUE (partially stripped `/*` and `*/` from code example) or http://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.2.0/README_EXT.html#label-Adding+New+Features+to+Ruby (list displayed as code block); note that the broken list is fixed in trunk (it's rather a workaround) by using "-" for the list items.
Minimal example for a pure rdoc page:
```
$ cat broken_page.rdoc
A list:
* item 1
* item 2
A sentence with *emphasis* directly at the
*start* of a line.
Some example C code with comment:
void
do_something(VALUE val)
{
/* comment */
}
```
For this rdoc produces:
A list:
```
item 1
item 2
```
A sentence with **emphasis** directly at the
```
start* of a line.
```
Some example C code with comment:
```
void
do_something(VALUE val)
{
comment
}
```
When generating rdoc of a Ruby class, the bug affects only the code example itself:
```
$ cat broken.rb
# A class with broken rdoc.
#
# A list:
#
# * item 1
# * item 2
#
# A sentence with *emphasis* directly at the
# *start* of a line.
#
# Some example C code with comment:
#
# void
# do_something(VALUE val)
# {
# /* comment */
# }
#
class Broken
end
```
This produces:
A class with broken rdoc.
A list:
* item 1
* item 2
A sentence with **emphasis** directly at the **start** of a line.
Some example C code with comment:
```
void
do_something(VALUE val)
{
comment
}
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>