[#75225] [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7) — k@...
Issue #12324 has been reported by Kazuki Yamaguchi.
6 messages
2016/04/27
[#78693] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
k@rhe.jp wrote:
[#78701] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@...>
2016/12/17
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:31:12AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#78702] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp> wrote:
[ruby-core:74767] [Ruby trunk Bug#12242] Is it worth adding collision probability of SecureRandom functions in RubyDoc?
From:
kashyap.kmbc@...
Date:
2016-04-01 09:46:13 UTC
List:
ruby-core #74767
Issue #12242 has been reported by Kashyap K. ---------------------------------------- Bug #12242: Is it worth adding collision probability of SecureRandom functions in RubyDoc? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12242 * Author: Kashyap K * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * ruby -v: * Backport: ---------------------------------------- Is it feasible and/or even useful to document the probability of collisions for the various random number generation methods in the SecureRandom module? I feel having a note to read about the possibility of collisions happening for the various key lengths and generator functions might help a lot of beginners. Although there are many birthday paradox checkers online, I felt it would be a nice to have on the documentation pages directly. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>