[#75225] [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7) — k@...
Issue #12324 has been reported by Kazuki Yamaguchi.
6 messages
2016/04/27
[#78693] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
k@rhe.jp wrote:
[#78701] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@...>
2016/12/17
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:31:12AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#78702] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12324] Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and drop support for 0.9.6/0.9.7)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/17
Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp> wrote:
[ruby-core:75068] [Ruby trunk Feature#11868] Proposal for RubyVM::InstructionSequence.compile to return an object containing the syntax error information currently written to STDERR
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2016-04-21 05:49:08 UTC
List:
ruby-core #75068
Issue #11868 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
Updated.
```
$ ./ruby -e 'begin eval("this.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax"); rescue SyntaxError => e; e.failures.each {|ex|p [ex.lineno, ex.column, ex.mesg]}; end'
[1, 14, "syntax error, unexpected keyword_not, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG\nthis.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax\n ^"]
[1, 29, "syntax error, unexpected tGVAR, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG\nthis.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax\n ^"]
```
----------------------------------------
Feature #11868: Proposal for RubyVM::InstructionSequence.compile to return an object containing the syntax error information currently written to STDERR
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11868#change-58192
* Author: Joe Rafaniello
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Currently, RubyVM::InstructionSequence.compile or RubyVM::InstructionSequence.new return a new InstructionSequence for valid ruby.
For invalid syntax, a SyntaxError is raised with a message of 'compile error'. Meanwhile, the useful information, line number(s) and hint(s) to the invalid syntax location, is printed on standard error. I am proposing this information be returned as an object in the event of a SyntaxError.
For example, here's good syntax:
~~~
RubyVM::InstructionSequence.new("x =1")
# => <RubyVM::InstructionSequence:<compiled>@<compiled>>
~~~
Here's bad syntax:
~~~
RubyVM::InstructionSequence.new("puts 'hi'\n puts 'hi2'\n\nthis.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax")
# => SyntaxError: compile error
# The useful hint and line number(s) are on standard error:
<compiled>:4: syntax error, unexpected keyword_not, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG
this.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax
^
<compiled>:4: syntax error, unexpected tGVAR, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG
this.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax
^
~~~
Some ideas:
1. Add methods to all SyntaxError exceptions to get all parse failures. For example: `syntax_error.parse_failures.each {|f| puts f.lineno; puts f.hint }`. In the above example, it failed on line 4 twice and we see two "hints."
2. Create a new method to RubyVM::InstructionSequence to check ruby syntax that would allow us to see if the syntax is valid and if not, the lineno and 'hint' for each parse failure.
Use case: Rubocop[a] and other utilities[b] are really complicated and check for valid ruby syntax by creating a process to run ruby -wc with the script.
[a] https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop/blob/86e1acf67794bf6dd5d65812b91df475e44fa320/spec/support/mri_syntax_checker.rb#L51-L63
[b] https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/6725fe52222c07d576a18126d2ff825ddc6dffd0/gems/pending/util/miq-syntax-checker.rb#L8-L13
It would be nice to remove all of this complexity and use RubyVM::InstructionSequence, which already has the information we need but in a more user friendly format.
Thanks!
Joe Rafaniello
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>