[#53893] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8204][Open] ObjectSpace.each_object(Bignum) can generate Bignums that are to small to be Bignums — "Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak)" <hanmac@...>
[#53914] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8206][Open] Should Ruby core implement String#blank? — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
[#53922] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8208][Open] Raise cached exceptions for nonblocking IO to avoid allocation/stack-copying costs — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
"headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#53950] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8211][Open] Performance regression of method calls — "dunric (David Unric)" <dunric29a@...>
[#53974] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8215][Open] Support accessing Fiber-locals and backtraces for a Fiber — "halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)" <ruby-lang-bugs@...>
[#54023] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8223][Open] Make Matrix more omnivorous. — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
[#54031] Question about r39944 — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi,
Even if test directory should be on the load path on test-all, you should
[#54095] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8237][Open] Logical method chaining via inferred receiver — "wardrop (Tom Wardrop)" <tom@...>
[#54175] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8254][Open] Ruby segfaults on second SystemStackError from parser — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charlie@...>
[#54185] [CommonRuby - Feature #8257][Open] Exception#cause to carry originating exception along with new one — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
(2013/04/12 1:40), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#54196] Encouraging use of CommonRuby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I think we need to do more to encourage the use of the CommonRuby
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune
As far as I understand, what is CommonRuby and the process over CommonRuby
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:25 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
(2013/04/12 16:40), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#54201] Has ObjectSpace changed recently? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I just noticed that in 2.0, I see this:
[#54207] [CommonRuby - Feature #8258][Open] Dir#escape_glob — "steveklabnik (Steve Klabnik)" <steve@...>
[#54218] [CommonRuby - Feature #8259][Open] Atomic attributes accessors — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
Issue #8259 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
I'm not sure if setting the attribute on the ivar is a good way to go.
[#54333] Requesting Commit Access — Aman Gupta <ruby@...1.net>
Hello ruby-core,
Hi,
[#54415] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8286][Open] Can't decode non-MIME Base64 — "adacosta (Alan Da Costa)" <alandacosta@...>
[#54459] [CommonRuby - Feature #8291][Open] Allow retrieving the root Fiber of a Thread — "halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)" <ruby-lang@...>
[#54473] [Backport 200 - Backport #8299][Open] Minor error in float parsing — "bobjalex (Bob Alexander)" <bobjalex@...>
[#54509] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8310][Open] resque-web crashes with segfault on Ruby 2.0.0-p0 only, Resque 1.24.1, Redis 2.6.12 — "vaharoni (Amit Aharoni)" <amit.sites@...>
[#54559] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8321][Open] Ripper: I would like coordinates for keywords — "ericp (Eric Promislow)" <eric.promislow@...>
[#54606] Plan to the first 2.0.0 patchlevel release. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello, Rubyists.
Hi,
Could you please backport the following:
[#54621] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8339][Open] Introducing Geneartional Garbage Collection for CRuby/MRI — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
(2013/04/28 9:23), authorNari (Narihiro Nakamura) wrote:
2013/4/28 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:
(2013/05/04 12:08), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
2013/5/4 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:
(2013/05/06 11:50), Tanaka Akira wrote:
2013/5/6 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:19 PM, ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
(2013/04/28 21:40), Magnus Holm wrote:
(2013/04/28 23:34), SASADA Koichi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2013/04/29 1:19), Magnus Holm wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 6:29 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#54665] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8344][Open] Status of Psych and Syck — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>
[ruby-core:54325] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
On Apr 10, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Zachary Scott wrote: > So is this a documentation bug? I haven't read the entire discussion The discussion has wandered some from the original bug report. I don't think there is consensus yet on the disposition of this report. While Time's handling of Float arguments is numerically correct, it is generally inappropriate for most users (IMHO). I would classify it as a "real" bug rather than a documentation bug. The Time class converts Float arguments (primarily seconds and microseconds) to Rationals using Float#to_r. Float#to_r creates a Rational that exactly represents the double precision value stored in the Float. The problem with using Float#to_r to convert seconds (or microseconds) to Rational is that it assumes the double precision value stored in the Float is the true value (i.e. the exact value to the nearest unit of precision). In the vast majority of cases the double precision value stored in the Float is not the true value but rather a binary approximation of the true value. Instead of using Float#to_r to capture the Float's binary approximation of the true value as a Rational, I think it would be preferable to capture a decimal approximation of the Float as a Rational One way to do this is to use Float#to_s to convert the seconds (or microseconds) to a decimal String approximation of the (binary approximation of the) true value, then use String#to_r to capture the decimal approximation of the Float as a Rational. The three main reasons for preferring the decimal approximation for Float seconds (or microseconds) are: 1) No unpleasant surprises for users, especially when using Float literals as in the original bug report. 2) Almost all users will have a fairly limited decimal precision of time (i.e. milliseconds, microseconds, nanoseconds) so the decimal approximation of the Float is likely to be equal to the true value whereas the binary approximation will not be. 3) Users with very high and/or non-decimal precision of time are unlikely to be using Floats anyway. Dave