[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>

I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this month.

14 messages 2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2014/04/03

It's good if we have a meeting then.

[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...> 2014/04/03

Regarding openssl issues, I’ve discussed possible meeting time with Martin last month and he seemed positive.

[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...> 2014/04/03

Hi,

[ruby-core:62066] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #8344] [Assigned] Status of Psych and Syck

From: Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Date: 2014-04-17 00:39:59 UTC
List: ruby-core #62066
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:31:31AM +0000, e@zzak.io wrote:
> Issue #8344 has been updated by Zachary Scott.
> 
> Status changed from Closed to Assigned
> Target version changed from 2.1.0 to current: 2.2.0
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> Bug #8344: Status of Psych and Syck
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8344#change-45911
> 
> * Author: Benoit Daloze
> * Status: Assigned
> * Priority: Normal
> * Assignee: Zachary Scott
> * Category: lib
> * Target version: current: 2.2.0
> * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-04-28 trunk 40513) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]
> * Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: REQUIRED
> ----------------------------------------
> Hello,
> 
> The current state of YAML being Psych is still a bit unclear (see lib/yaml.rb).
> 
> I propose to document YAML as always being (=) Psych,
> and give a tip about the syck gem which might be used with the Syck constant (but the YAML constant is always Psych).
> 
> Do we need to keep Psych::EngineManager? I guess for compatibility it is safer?
> May I document it as deprecated so it might removed in a future version?

We should document it as deprecated, I want to remove it.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

In This Thread