From: Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Date: 2014-04-29T00:58:21+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:62197] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.

Hi,

> I agree with the scheme.
>
>                                                        matz.
Thank you for your reply.

naruse-san, how do you think?



2014-04-26 17:25 GMT+09:00 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby.or.jp>:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with the scheme.
>
>                                                         matz.
>
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:62119] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer."
>     on Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:22:28 +0900, Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@gmail.com> writes:
> |
> |Hi,
> |
> |> I hope to support you. Can I commit for 2.1 branch?
> |Supports for release engineering are welcome.
> |But I think backport management have some complexities.
> |The maintainers should have cooperate closely if they have equal authority.
> |My proposal is as below.
> |
> |1. Co-maintainer can request permission for individual backport/release.
> |2. Maintainer approve it (or do it by myself)
> |3. Co-maintainer can commit maintenance branch or release package.
> |
> |How about this scheme?
> |
> |Anyway I appreciate to your proposal :)
> |
> |Regards,