[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this month.
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I’ve discussed possible meeting time with Martin last month and he seemed positive.
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I’m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62247] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9688] Ruby's child process inherits parent's sockets (mswin)
From:
usa@...
Date:
2014-04-30 07:38:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62247
Issue #9688 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED to 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: REQUIRED
backported into ruby_2_0_0 at r45753.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9688: Ruby's child process inherits parent's sockets (mswin)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9688#change-46399
* Author: Akio Tajima
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Usaku NAKAMURA
* Category: platform/windows
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.1p76 (2014-02-24 revision 45161) [i386-mswin32_100]
* Backport: 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
When Ruby application creates child process, sockets are inherited from the parent process.
This causes severe troubles.
In my situation, I have some web services using WEBrick and Sinatra. They invoke child process as a batch file using kernel.system method. And in the batch file I launch some long running applications by 'start'.
If these type of long running applications stay in running state, I never restart the services because the children grab server sockets while running. What is worse that Windows never report EADDRINUSE so I have no clue to judge its condition. Indeed 'netstat /b' reports the port is occupied by System not the child app.
Below is the reproduction script.
~~~
require 'socket'
require 'timeout'
exit unless RUBY_PLATFORM =~ /mswin/
BAT = "#{ENV['TMP']}#{File::SEPARATOR}test_inheritsock.bat"
File.open(BAT, 'w') do |fout|
fout.puts 'start ruby -e "sleep(10)"'
end
port = nil
TCPServer.open(0) do |gs|
port = gs.addr[1]
system(BAT)
end
File.delete BAT
gs = TCPServer.open(port)
running = true
client = false
begin
timeout(20) do
while running
Thread.start do
s = gs.accept
s.gets
s.close
running = false
end
unless client
client = true
Thread.start do
TCPSocket.open('localhost', port) do |sock|
sock.puts('')
end
end
else
sleep(1)
end
end
end
puts 'no problem'
rescue Timeout::Error
puts 'failed'
end
gs.close
~~~
The second opend TCPServer can not receive a connection request.
Unak already made no inheritance patch (https://gist.github.com/unak/9825743) and I tested it with Windowds7(x86) and Windows8.1(x64) and in both environments the above script runs completely.
So I wonder if the patch is applied to the trunk.
Thanks in advance.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/