[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this mo=
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I=E2=80=99ve discussed possible meeting time with=
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I=E2=80=99m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62024] Question about Ruby Arrays
From:
Mohamed Dokmak <mdokmak92@...>
Date:
2014-04-14 17:06:39 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62024
Hi,=0A=0AI'm trying to implement a functionality that hooks on array modifi= cations "by reference" but I find it complicated to implement such hook.=0A= =0AEx :=A0=0A=0Aarr =3D [12 , "hello" ]=0A=0Aarr.reverse!=0Aarr.reverse=0A= =0A=0AThe first one will reverse the array by reference "same VALUE" withou= t creating a new object but just modifying its value by its reference " sam= e as opt_aset YARV instruction ".=0A=0AThe second will create a new array i= nstance and return a different reference "VALUE" holding the change.=0A=0AI= s there another way that could help me implement such a hook ? possibly a m= ethod I haven't discovered yet ? I've looked at rb_ary_modify_check but it'= s much related to shared arrays.=0A=0AI need ideas on implementing a hook t= hat enables me to know when Ruby uses a method dispatch such as arr.reverse= ! and return the same reference to the object ?=0A=0A--=0AMohamed Dokmak