[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this mo=
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I=E2=80=99ve discussed possible meeting time with=
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I=E2=80=99m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:61861] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9703] [Open] Inconsistent profile output
From:
silverhammermba+ruby@...
Date:
2014-04-04 16:02:49 UTC
List:
ruby-core #61861
Issue #9703 has been reported by Max Anselm.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9703: Inconsistent profile output
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9703
* Author: Max Anselm
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: lib
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.1p76 (2014-02-24 revision 45161) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
The output of the profile lib seems to be partially dependent on how it is required. For example,
~~~
ruby -rprofile -e '0==1'
~~~
shows one call to Fixnum#== as expected
~~~
ruby -e 'require "profile"; 0==1'
~~~
does not show any calls to Fixnum#== !!!
~~~
ruby -e 'require "profile"; eval("0==1")'
~~~
again shows one call to Fixnum#== as expected.
See also: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22861559/what-is-the-difference-between-r-profile-and-require-profile
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/