[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this mo=
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I=E2=80=99ve discussed possible meeting time with=
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I=E2=80=99m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62255] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9781] Feature Proposal: Method#super_method
From:
ko1@...
Date:
2014-04-30 17:11:38 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62255
Issue #9781 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
(2014/05/01 1:35), nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
>
> It's an ordinary `Method` (or `UnboundMethod`) instance, same as `SuperClass.instance_method(:foo).bind(obj)`.
Oh, OK. I misunderstood the spec of Method class.
--
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net
----------------------------------------
Feature #9781: Feature Proposal: Method#super_method
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9781#change-46416
* Author: Richard Schneeman
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: core
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
When `super` is called in a method the Ruby VM knows how to find the next ancestor that has that method and call it. It is difficult to do this manually, so I propose we expose this information in Method#super_location.
Ruby Method class (http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-2.1.1/Method.html) is returned by calling Object.method and passing in a method name (http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-2.1.1/Object.html#method-i-method). This is useful for debugging:
```ruby
# /tmp/code.rb
class Foo
def bar
end
end
puts Foo.new.method(:bar).source_location
# => ["/tmp/code.rb", 3]
```
The Object#method allows a ruby developer to easily track the source location of the method and makes debugging very easy. However if the code is being invoked by a call to `super` it is difficult to track down:
```ruby
# /tmp/code.rb
class BigFoo
def bar
end
end
class Foo < BigFoo
def bar
super
end
end
```
In this code sample it is easy to find the method definition inside of Foo but it is very difficult in large projects to find what code exactly `super` is calling. This simple example is easy, but it can be hard when there are many ancestors. Currently if I wanted to find this we can inspect ancestors
```ruby
Foo.ancestors[1..-1].map do |ancestor|
next unless ancestor.method_defined?(:bar)
ancestor.instance_method(:bar)
end.compact.first.source_location
```
To make this process simpler I am proposing a method on the Method class that would return the result of `super`
It could be called like this:
```ruby
Foo.new.method(:bar).super_method
```
I believe adding Method#super_method, or exposing this same information somewhere else, could greatly help developers to debug large systems easily.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/