From: "NARUSE, Yui" Date: 2014-04-30T11:53:10+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:62230] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. I agree with the scheme. 2014-04-29 0:58 GMT+09:00 Tomoyuki Chikanaga : > Hi, > >> I agree with the scheme. >> >> matz. > Thank you for your reply. > > naruse-san, how do you think? > > > > 2014-04-26 17:25 GMT+09:00 Yukihiro Matsumoto : >> Hi, >> >> I agree with the scheme. >> >> matz. >> >> >> In message "Re: [ruby-core:62119] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer." >> on Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:22:28 +0900, Tomoyuki Chikanaga writes: >> | >> |Hi, >> | >> |> I hope to support you. Can I commit for 2.1 branch? >> |Supports for release engineering are welcome. >> |But I think backport management have some complexities. >> |The maintainers should have cooperate closely if they have equal authority. >> |My proposal is as below. >> | >> |1. Co-maintainer can request permission for individual backport/release. >> |2. Maintainer approve it (or do it by myself) >> |3. Co-maintainer can commit maintenance branch or release package. >> | >> |How about this scheme? >> | >> |Anyway I appreciate to your proposal :) >> | >> |Regards, -- NARUSE, Yui