[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this mo=
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I=E2=80=99ve discussed possible meeting time with=
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I=E2=80=99m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62067] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8344] Status of Psych and Syck
From:
tenderlove@...
Date:
2014-04-17 00:40:34 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62067
Issue #8344 has been updated by Aaron Patterson. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:31:31AM +0000, e@zzak.io wrote: > Issue #8344 has been updated by Zachary Scott. > > Status changed from Closed to Assigned > Target version changed from 2.1.0 to current: 2.2.0 > > ---------------------------------------- > Bug #8344: Status of Psych and Syck > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8344#change-45911 > > * Author: Benoit Daloze > * Status: Assigned > * Priority: Normal > * Assignee: Zachary Scott > * Category: lib > * Target version: current: 2.2.0 > * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-04-28 trunk 40513) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0] > * Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: REQUIRED > ---------------------------------------- > Hello, > > The current state of YAML being Psych is still a bit unclear (see lib/yaml.rb). > > I propose to document YAML as always being (=) Psych, > and give a tip about the syck gem which might be used with the Syck constant (but the YAML constant is always Psych). > > Do we need to keep Psych::EngineManager? I guess for compatibility it is safer? > May I document it as deprecated so it might removed in a future version? We should document it as deprecated, I want to remove it. -- Aaron Patterson http://tenderlovemaking.com/ ---------------------------------------- Bug #8344: Status of Psych and Syck https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8344#change-46240 * Author: Benoit Daloze * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Zachary Scott * Category: lib * Target version: current: 2.2.0 * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-04-28 trunk 40513) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0] * Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- Hello, The current state of YAML being Psych is still a bit unclear (see lib/yaml.rb). I propose to document YAML as always being (=) Psych, and give a tip about the syck gem which might be used with the Syck constant (but the YAML constant is always Psych). Do we need to keep Psych::EngineManager? I guess for compatibility it is safer? May I document it as deprecated so it might removed in a future version? Related to #6163. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/