From: "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Date: 2013-04-12T13:25:24+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:54211] Re: Encouraging use of CommonRuby

--bcaec51b15eb9524cd04da224aec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

As far as I understand, what is CommonRuby and the process over CommonRuby
is not well defined yet.

For example original birxen's plan allows only implementers to propose a
new feature.
(Personally I'm neutral about this restriction though a standard must have
at least one major implementation over seeing W3C/RFC standards)

In addition saying "here is not correct place, make ticket there" is not
desired because
* it prevent creating a ticket by other than us
* it is troublesome for me to say it; I want to simply ignore rubbish
feature requests

Anyway before encouraging, define CommonRuby and its maintenance rule.



2013/4/12 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>

>  Hi,
>
> Encouraging use of CommonRuby would do a lot to show that the
>> implementations are collaborating on the future of Ruby
>
>
> My thought is that all feature requests for trunk should be considered
> Common Ruby.
>
> I'm not sure I see the point of having two separate "projects". What would
> a "bug" in Common Ruby mean?
>
> it would
>> help us implementers filter out MRI-specific bugs/features from those
>> that will affect our implementations.
>
>
> Can't you filter on the subject of the message for "Feature"?
>
> If so, I would simply merge Common Ruby into trunk
>



-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse@airemix.jp>

--bcaec51b15eb9524cd04da224aec
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">As far as I understand, what is CommonRuby and the process=
 over CommonRuby is not well defined yet.<div style><br></div><div style>Fo=
r example original birxen&#39;s plan allows only implementers to propose a =
new feature.</div>

<div style>(Personally I&#39;m neutral about this restriction though a stan=
dard must have at least one major implementation over seeing W3C/RFC standa=
rds)</div><div style><br></div><div style>In addition saying &quot;here is =
not correct place, make ticket there&quot; is not desired because</div>

<div style>* it prevent creating a ticket by other than us</div><div style>=
* it is troublesome for me to say it; I want to simply ignore rubbish featu=
re requests</div><div style><br></div><div style>Anyway before encouraging,=
 define CommonRuby and its=A0maintenance rule.=A0</div>

<div style><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D=
"gmail_quote">2013/4/12 Marc-Andre Lafortune <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca" target=3D"_blank">ruby-cor=
e-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca</a>&gt;</span><br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>=A0Hi,</div><div class=3D"im"><div><br></di=
v><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin-top:0px;margin-right:0p=
x;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-col=
or:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">




Encouraging use of CommonRuby would do a lot to show that the<br>
implementations are collaborating on the future of Ruby</blockquote><div><b=
r></div></div>My thought is that all feature requests for trunk should be c=
onsidered Common Ruby.<div><br></div><div>I&#39;m not sure I see the point =
of having two separate &quot;projects&quot;. What would a &quot;bug&quot; i=
n Common Ruby mean?</div>

<div class=3D"im">

<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin-top:0px;ma=
rgin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;bo=
rder-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">



 it would<br>
help us implementers filter out MRI-specific bugs/features from those<br>
that will affect our implementations.</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div=
>Can&#39;t you filter on the subject of the message for &quot;Feature&quot;=
?</div><div><br></div><div>If so, I would simply merge Common Ruby into tru=
nk</div>



</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>NARUSE, Yui =
=A0&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:naruse@airemix.jp" target=3D"_blank">naruse@airemi=
x.jp</a>&gt;
</div>

--bcaec51b15eb9524cd04da224aec--