From: "henry.maddocks (Henry Maddocks)" Date: 2013-04-15T12:02:06+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:54276] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8237] Logical method chaining via inferred receiver Issue #8237 has been updated by henry.maddocks (Henry Maddocks). wardrop (Tom Wardrop) wrote: > =begin > Don't pick apart the trivial examples too much Henry.. > > =end If you want your request to be taken seriously your example usage should show that you have thoroughly considered how this feature will be used, how it will effect existing code, and the edge cases that might crop up. It's our job to point out issues we see with what you have presented. So, yes, I will pick apart your trivial examples until you demonstrate that you have thought the feature through. ---------------------------------------- Feature #8237: Logical method chaining via inferred receiver https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8237#change-38565 Author: wardrop (Tom Wardrop) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: =begin This is a feature suggestion that was raised while discussing issue #8191. The feature suggestion is to introduce some form of logical method chaining to address this reasonably common pattern: user && user.profile && user.profile.website && user.profile.website.thumbnail It would be reasonably trivial to shorten this to: user && .profile && .website && .thumbnail The implementation I propose would be for Ruby to allow an inferred receiver; the dot prefix would be the syntax for this. The inferred receiver would resolve to the result of the last expression in the current scope. For illustrative purposes, the following would work under this proposal: "some string" puts .upcase #=> SOME STRING Another example: puts .upcase if obj.success_message || obj.error_message # Instead of... message = (obj.success_message || obj.error_message) puts message.upcase if message This can also potentially provide an alternative option in syntactically awkward scenario's, such as dealing with the return value of an if statement or a catch block, avoiding the need for temporary variable assignment: catch :halt do # Do something end if .nil? log.info "Request was halted" response.body = "Sorry, but your request could not be completed" end The logical chaining scenario is the main use case however. I just wanted to demonstrate how the proposed implementation could also be used in other creative ways. =end -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/