From: "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
Date: 2013-04-12T17:43:20+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:54218] [CommonRuby - Feature #8259][Open] Atomic attributes accessors


Issue #8259 has been reported by funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov).

----------------------------------------
Feature #8259: Atomic attributes accessors
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8259

Author: funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 


Motivated by this gist https://gist.github.com/jstorimer/5298581 and atomic gem

I propose Class.attr_atomic which will add methods for atomic swap and CAS:

=begin
  class MyNode
    attr_accessor :item
    attr_atomic :successor

    def initialize(item, successor)
      @item = item
      @successor = successor
    end
  end
  node = MyNode.new(i, other_node)

  # attr_atomic ensures at least #{attr} reader method exists. May be, it should
  # be sure it does volatile access.
  node.successor

  # #{attr}_cas(old_value, new_value) do CAS: atomic compare and swap
  if node.successor_cas(other_node, new_node)
    print "there were no interleaving with other threads"
  end

  # #{attr}_swap atomically swaps value and returns old value.
  # It ensures that no other thread interleaves getting old value and setting
  # new one by cas (or other primitive if exists, like in Java 8)
  node.successor_swap(new_node)
=end

It will be very simple for MRI cause of GIL, and it will use atomic primitives for
other implementations.

Note: both #{attr}_swap and #{attr}_cas should raise an error if instance variable were not explicitly set before.

Example for nonblocking queue: https://gist.github.com/funny-falcon/5370416

Something similar should be proposed for Structs. May be override same method as Struct.attr_atomic

Open question for reader:
should (({attr_atomic :my_attr})) ensure that #my_attr reader method exists?
Should it guarantee that #my_attr provides 'volatile' access?
May be, (({attr_reader :my_attr})) already ought to provide 'volatile' semantic?
May be, semantic of @my_attr should have volatile semantic (i doubt for that)?


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/