[#62904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9894] [Open] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — normalperson@...
Issue #9894 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/06/02
[#63321] [ANN] ElixirConf 2014 - Don't Miss Jos辿 Valim and Dave Thomas — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
Just a few more weeks until ElixirConf 2014!
6 messages
2014/06/24
[#63391] Access Modifiers (Internal Interfaces) — Daniel da Silva Ferreira <danieldasilvaferreira@...>
Hi,
3 messages
2014/06/28
[ruby-core:63328] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8344] [Closed] Status of Psych and Syck
From:
shibata.hiroshi@...
Date:
2014-06-26 02:52:54 UTC
List:
ruby-core #63328
Issue #8344 has been updated by Hiroshi SHIBATA. Status changed from Assigned to Closed Applied in changeset r46559. ---------- Revert "Revert "* lib/yaml.rb: Remove Psych::EngineManager [Bug #8344]"" syck-1.0.3 gem support this imcompatible changes. This reverts commit r46102 ---------------------------------------- Bug #8344: Status of Psych and Syck https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8344#change-47378 * Author: Benoit Daloze * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Aaron Patterson * Category: lib * Target version: current: 2.2.0 * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-04-28 trunk 40513) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0] * Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- Hello, The current state of YAML being Psych is still a bit unclear (see lib/yaml.rb). I propose to document YAML as always being (=) Psych, and give a tip about the syck gem which might be used with the Syck constant (but the YAML constant is always Psych). Do we need to keep Psych::EngineManager? I guess for compatibility it is safer? May I document it as deprecated so it might removed in a future version? Related to #6163. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/