[#62904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9894] [Open] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — normalperson@...
Issue #9894 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/06/02
[#63321] [ANN] ElixirConf 2014 - Don't Miss Jos辿 Valim and Dave Thomas — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
Just a few more weeks until ElixirConf 2014!
6 messages
2014/06/24
[ruby-core:62943] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9573] descendants of a module don't gain its future ancestors, but descendants of a class, do
From:
shibata.hiroshi@...
Date:
2014-06-05 06:16:16 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62943
Issue #9573 has been updated by Hiroshi SHIBATA. ref. https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/549 ---------------------------------------- Bug #9573: descendants of a module don't gain its future ancestors, but descendants of a class, do https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9573#change-47045 * Author: First Last * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.1p76 (2014-02-24 revision 45161) [i686-linux] * Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby module Mod1 end module Mod2 end class Class1 end class Class2 < Class1 end p Class2.ancestors - Object.ancestors # [Class2, Class1] Class1.include Mod1 p Class2.ancestors - Object.ancestors # [Class2, Class1, Mod1] Mod1.include Mod2 p Mod1.ancestors - Object.ancestors # [Mod1, Mod2] p Class2.ancestors - Object.ancestors # [Class2, Class1, Mod1] ``` ________________________________________________________________ note that descendants of a class do gain its future ancestors so 2 issues: 1. It would seem natural that in dynamic language, dynamically added ancestors should propagate to descendants 2. Why is there a difference in ancestor propagation between modules and classes -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/